Skip to content

CSRE vs TRUT

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF

CSRECNYSE Arca

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.56pt a year

CSRE0.70%TRUT0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

CSRE182KTRUT182K

CSRE vs TRUT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+13.3%CSRE+9.6%TRUT

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CSRE +13.3%. TRUT +9.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%20%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CSRE 0.70%
TRUT 0.14%, better
Fund size
CSRE $670M
TRUT $238M
1Y total return
CSRE +13.3%, better
TRUT +9.6%
Yield (12M)
CSRE 2.03%, better
TRUT 0.36%
Holdings
CSRE 46
TRUT 77
Avg volume (30D)
CSRE 182K sh
TRUT 182K sh
NAV per share
CSRE $28.07
TRUT $31.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CSRE: Cost 32, Risk 67, Mission 83, Tradability 59, Holdings 54, Durability 41. TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for CSRE, TRUT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCSRETRUT
Cost30% weightD32A93Higher
Mission25% weightA83Not scored
Risk15% weightB67HigherF23
Tradability15% weightB59A96Higher
Holdings10% weightC54HigherD31
Durability5% weightC41B61Higher

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CSRE and TRUT are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TRUT ranks 4th and CSRE 17th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2ATMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BTRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 15CJTEKJPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETFScore 50
  7. Rank 17CCSRECohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETFScore 48
  8. Rank 18CGTOPGoldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CSRECCohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF

TRUTBVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

In short

CSRE Active real estate, run by a house that specializes in it. Cohen & Steers holds a tight book of listed property names picked bottom-up on relative value, not by index weight. Launched in 2025.

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

Stated mandate

CSRE The Fund seeks total return through publicly traded real estate securities. It is actively managed using a bottom-up, relative-value process to select investments.

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

Why people hold it

  • CSRE Genuinely active, not an index in disguise: a bottom-up, relative-value process using a proprietary valuation model to pick listed real estate securities.
  • Roughly 40 holdings, so a single conviction call carries real weight instead of being diluted across hundreds of names.
  • The portfolio lines up closely with what the prospectus promises: real estate equity, actively selected, no drift into whatever sector is hot.
  • Trades tightly for a fund this young, and distributions come on a quarterly schedule.
  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.

Worth knowing

  • CSRE 0.70% a year is above the typical active equity ETF, and a large multiple of low-cost core options like DFAU and DFAC. Active selection has to earn that gap.
  • Launched in 2025, so the live record is short and risk measures rest on thin history.
  • One sector, concentrated: property cycles and interest rates drive the ride here, on a very different path from a broad equity fund.
  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.

Full CSRE profile⁠

Full TRUT profile⁠

CSRE vs TRUT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CSRE vs TRUT Cost

Overpaying CSRE vs TRUT

$10,674

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CSRE 0.70%

    $13,606

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CSRE 0.70%
  • TRUT 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CSRE $13,606TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearCSRETRUTOverpaying
10$1,250$256$994
20$4,760$1,000$3,760
30$13,606$2,932$10,674

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%CSRE
  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

CSRE 24th cheapest of 35 funds

CSRE vs TRUT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CSRE 2.03%, better
TRUT 0.36%
Payout (12M)
CSRE $0.58
TRUT $0.11
Last payment
CSRE $0.13
TRUT $0.03
Ex-dividend
CSRE Sep 29, 2026
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
CSRE Sep 30, 2026
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
CSRE Quarterly
TRUT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CSREQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll CSRE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2025 $0.16; Jun 27, 2025 $0.15; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 15, 2025 $0.20; Mar 30, 2026 $0.11; Jun 29, 2026 $0.13; Sep 29, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

CSRE vs TRUT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CSRE 13.7%since Mar 2025TRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CSRE 0.29since Mar 2025TRUT 0.78since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CSRE −13.0%since Feb 2025TRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CSRE 0.51TRUT 1.76

CSRE and TRUT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CSRECvsAVREA

    Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTBvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSRECvsPSRA

    Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTBvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSRECvsTMEDA

    Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTBvsTMEDA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.