IMF ranks 1st and CTA 8th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
CTA vs IMF
IMF −0.21pt a year
0.86%0.65%
CTA 65.0×the volume
565K8.68K
CTA vs IMF Performance
+16.1%+20.8%
- CTA 0.86%
- IMF 0.65%, better
- CTA $1.36B
- IMF $306M
- CTA +16.1%
- IMF +20.8%, better
- CTA 5.18%
- IMF
- CTA 25
- IMF 17
- CTA 565K sh, better
- IMF 8.68K sh
- CTA $30.12
- IMF $52.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTA | IMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C43 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F22 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | |
| Durability | A83Higher | B68 |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. CTA and IMF are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CTAB
IMFA
In short
CTA Simplify didn't build its own trend models, it rented them. CTA runs systematic long/short futures programs from Altis Partners, a commodity trading advisor with 20-plus years in the chair, at the lowest fee in its peer group.
Stated mandate
CTA The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by systematically investing in futures to create an absolute return profile and capture price trends.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CTA vs IMF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTA vs IMF Cost
Overpaying CTA vs IMF
$3,651
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTA 0.86%
$16,368
IMF 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTA | IMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $1,163 | $362 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $4,440 | $1,328 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $12,717 | $3,651 |
- 0.86%CTA
- 0.65%IMF, cheaper
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
IMF 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
CTA 8th cheapest of 14 funds
CTA vs IMF Dividends
- CTA 5.18%
- IMF
- CTA $1.55
- IMF
- CTA $0.13
- IMF $0.46
- CTA Oct 27, 2026
- IMF Dec 22, 2025
- CTA Oct 30, 2026
- IMF Dec 26, 2025
- CTA Monthly
- IMF Irregular
Distribution history
CTA vs IMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTA 14.9%IMF 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTA 0.49IMF 0.16
- Worst fall
- CTA −20.8%IMF −15.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CTA −0.19IMF 0.09
CTA and IMF in the news



Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record



Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.