WTMF ranks 2nd and CTA 8th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
CTA vs WTMF
WTMF −0.20pt a year
0.86%0.66%
CTA 15.9×the volume
565K35.5K
CTA +0.2pt
+11.3%+11.1%
CTA vs WTMF Performance
+16.1%+13.5%
- CTA 0.86%
- WTMF 0.66%, better
- CTA $1.36B
- WTMF $264M
- CTA +16.1%, better
- WTMF +13.5%
- CTA 5.18%
- WTMF 7.87%, better
- CTA 25
- WTMF 27
- CTA 565K sh, better
- WTMF 35.5K sh
- CTA $30.12
- WTMF $39.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTA | WTMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C43 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F22 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | C45Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A83Higher | A80 |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. CTA and WTMF are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CTAB
WTMFA
In short
CTA Simplify didn't build its own trend models, it rented them. CTA runs systematic long/short futures programs from Altis Partners, a commodity trading advisor with 20-plus years in the chair, at the lowest fee in its peer group.
WTMF A managed futures veteran. Trading since 2011, WTMF takes rules-based long and short positions across commodity, currency, equity and rate futures, aiming for returns with limited direct link to stocks or bonds.
Stated mandate
CTA The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by systematically investing in futures to create an absolute return profile and capture price trends.
WTMF The Fund seeks positive total returns in rising or falling markets with limited direct correlation to broad equity or fixed-income returns. It uses a quantitative, rules-based approach with long and short futures positions across commodity, currency, equity, and interest-rate markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CTA vs WTMF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTA vs WTMF Cost
Overpaying CTA vs WTMF
$3,472
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTA 0.86%
$16,368
WTMF 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTA | WTMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $1,180 | $345 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $4,504 | $1,264 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $12,896 | $3,472 |
- 0.86%CTA
- 0.66%WTMF, cheaper
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
WTMF 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
CTA 8th cheapest of 14 funds
CTA vs WTMF Dividends
- CTA 5.18%
- WTMF 7.87%, better
- CTA $1.55
- WTMF $3.14
- CTA $0.13
- WTMF $2.81
- CTA Oct 27, 2026
- WTMF Oct 27, 2026
- CTA Oct 30, 2026
- WTMF Oct 29, 2026
- CTA Monthly
- WTMF Annual
Distribution history
CTA vs WTMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTA 14.9%WTMF 6.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CTA 0.49WTMF 0.98, better
- Worst fall
- CTA −20.8%WTMF −13.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CTA −0.19WTMF 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





