Skip to content
etf.net

CTAU vs XMAR

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

CTAUCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

XMARBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAU −0.55pt a year

CTAU0.30%XMAR0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

XMAR 9.7×the volume

CTAU947XMAR9.23K

CTAU vs XMAR Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.4%CTAU+0.2%XMAR

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTAU −0.4%. XMAR +0.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%0.75%1%1.25%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
CTAU 0.30%, better
XMAR 0.85%
Fund size
CTAU $1M
XMAR $160M
1Y total return
CTAU No data
XMAR +10.7%
Holdings
CTAU 4
XMAR 4
Avg volume (30D)
CTAU 947 sh
XMAR 9.23K sh, better
NAV per share
CTAU $25.14
XMAR $43.73
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAU: Cost 92, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 10, Holdings not scored, Durability 8. XMAR: Cost 40, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 69, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAU, XMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAUXMAR
Cost30% weightA92HigherC40
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45A76Higher
Tradability15% weightF10C50Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB69
Durability5% weightF8B63Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAU and XMAR are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

XMAR ranks 1st and CTAU 7th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BXMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - MarchScore 54
  2. Rank 2CXNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 52
  3. Rank 6CXDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44
  4. Rank 7CCTAUCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAUCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

XMARBFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

In short

CTAU No data

XMAR Most accelerated ETFs double your upside and hand you the full downside. XMAR runs the accelerator with a net: about twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, plus a 15% cushion against losses.

Stated mandate

CTAU No data

XMAR The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 12.22% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

CTAU No data

  • XMAR The rare two-sided deal: roughly 2x any positive price move in SPY up to a cap, with the first 15% of SPY's losses absorbed, over a one-year outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • Innovator's accelerated funds (XDSQ, XTAP) give the 2x kicker with single exposure to the downside. XMAR keeps the kicker and adds the buffer.innovatoretfs.com
  • No maturity date. The cap resets to prevailing market conditions when each March period rolls, so the position can be held across periods without re-buying.businesswire.com
  • Among the stronger builds in a small field of accelerated SPY strategies, with a defined-risk profile that stands out in the group.

Worth knowing

CTAU No data

  • XMAR Cap and buffer are engineered for the full March-to-March period. Step in or out mid-period and you get different terms than the headline math.ftportfolios.com
  • It references SPY's price return, so S&P 500 dividends sit outside the payoff. Below the buffer, losses track the index one for one.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.85% a year, above the 0.79% typical of its accelerated peers, and it trades thinly, so the spread is part of your cost.

Full CTAU profile⁠

Full XMAR profile⁠

CTAU vs XMAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAU vs XMAR Cost

Overpaying XMAR vs CTAU

$10,050

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAU 0.30%

    $6,149

  • XMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAU 0.30%
  • XMAR 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XMAR $16,199CTAU $6,149

Year by year

YearCTAUXMAROverpaying
10$545$1,508$963
20$2,113$5,706$3,593
30$6,149$16,199$10,050

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTAU, cheaper
  • 0.85%XMAR
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTAU cheapest of 7 funds

XMAR 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

CTAU vs XMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTAU None
XMAR None

Distribution history

CTAUAll CTAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XMARAll XMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTAU vs XMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAU No dataXMAR 3.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAU No dataXMAR 1.96
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAU No dataXMAR −7.3%since Mar 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAU 0.00XMAR 0.23

Popular comparisons

  • CTAUCvsXNOVC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XMARBvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTAUCvsXSEPC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XMARBvsXSEPC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTAUCvsXJANC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XMARBvsXJANC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.