Skip to content

XMAR vs XSEP

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

XMARBCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

XSEPCCboe

Overlap

0.6%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

XMAR0.85%XSEP0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

XSEP 1.5×the volume

XMAR9.23KXSEP13.4K

3Y return · a year

XMAR +1.0pt

XMAR+11.4%XSEP+10.4%

XMAR vs XSEP Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.7%XMAR+8.2%XSEP

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. XMAR +10.7%. XSEP +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
XMAR 0.85%
XSEP 0.85%
Fund size
XMAR $160M
XSEP $99M
1Y total return
XMAR +10.7%, better
XSEP +8.2%
Holdings
XMAR 4
XSEP 4
Avg volume (30D)
XMAR 9.23K sh
XSEP 13.4K sh, better
NAV per share
XMAR $43.73
XSEP $45.38
52W range

ETF.net Grade

XMAR: Cost 40, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 69, Durability 63. XSEP: Cost 40, Risk 44, Mission 91, Tradability 75, Holdings 53, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for XMAR, XSEP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarXMARXSEP
Cost30% weightC40C40
Mission25% weightNot scoredA91
Risk15% weightA76HigherC44
Tradability15% weightC50A75Higher
Holdings10% weightB69HigherC53
Durability5% weightB63B66Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. XMAR and XSEP are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 7 ›

XMAR ranks 1st and XSEP 3rd of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BXMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - MarchScore 54
  2. Rank 2CXNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 52
  3. Rank 3CXSEPFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 51
  4. Rank 4CXJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

XMARBFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

XSEPCFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

In short

XMAR Most accelerated ETFs double your upside and hand you the full downside. XMAR runs the accelerator with a net: about twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, plus a 15% cushion against losses.

XSEP Most buffer ETFs trade away upside for protection. XSEP doubles it: about 2x the price move of the S&P 500 ETF it references, up to a yearly cap, with the first 15% of losses absorbed.

Stated mandate

XMAR The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 12.22% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

XSEP The Fund seeks about twice the positive price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 9.58% upside cap, while protecting the first 15% of losses during the September 22, 2025–September 18, 2026 outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • XMAR The rare two-sided deal: roughly 2x any positive price move in SPY up to a cap, with the first 15% of SPY's losses absorbed, over a one-year outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • Innovator's accelerated funds (XDSQ, XTAP) give the 2x kicker with single exposure to the downside. XMAR keeps the kicker and adds the buffer.innovatoretfs.com
  • No maturity date. The cap resets to prevailing market conditions when each March period rolls, so the position can be held across periods without re-buying.businesswire.com
  • Among the stronger builds in a small field of accelerated SPY strategies, with a defined-risk profile that stands out in the group.
  • XSEP The "enhance" is literal: the fund aims for roughly 2x any positive price move in the S&P 500 ETF it references, up to a cap set when each September period starts.ftportfolios.com
  • Downside first: it absorbs the reference ETF's first 15% of losses, before fees, across the one-year outcome period.sec.gov
  • A 1940 Act ETF built on FLEX options rather than a bank-issued note, so no issuer credit risk, and you can trade it any market day.sec.gov
  • One of twelve monthly-dated siblings in First Trust's Enhance & Moderate lineup, so a fresh cap and a reset 15% buffer arrive every September.ftportfolios.com

Worth knowing

  • XMAR Cap and buffer are engineered for the full March-to-March period. Step in or out mid-period and you get different terms than the headline math.ftportfolios.com
  • It references SPY's price return, so S&P 500 dividends sit outside the payoff. Below the buffer, losses track the index one for one.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.85% a year, above the 0.79% typical of its accelerated peers, and it trades thinly, so the spread is part of your cost.
  • XSEP The doubled upside is paid for with a ceiling: above the cap you stop participating. Cap and buffer are calibrated for holders of the full September-to-September period.sec.gov
  • It follows price return only, so the S&P 500's dividends sit outside the math.sec.gov
  • The 0.85% expense ratio prices above the median of its buffer-ETF peer group, and the fund is thinly traded, so limit orders earn their keep.

Full XMAR profile⁠

Full XSEP profile⁠

XMAR vs XSEP Holdings

How XMAR and XSEP differ

Overlap by weight

0.6%

Shared holdings make up 1.1% of XSEP and 0.6% of XMAR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.6%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.2%

Sector

Sector weights in XMAR and XSEP, widest gap first
SectorMore in XMARMore in XSEP
CommunicationXSEP +0.6 points
TechnologyXMAR +0.5 points
Health CareXMAR +0.5 points
EnergyXMAR +0.4 points
IndustrialsXSEP +0.3 points
FinancialsXSEP +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesXMAR +0.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryXSEP +0.2 points
MaterialsXSEP +0.2 points
Real EstateSame weight
UtilitiesSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for XSEP.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • XMAR125.8%
  • XSEP111.5%

Securities held

  • XMAR3
  • XSEP3

Asset class

XMAR
Multi-Asset
XSEP
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in XMAR3
  • In both0
  • Only in XSEP3

Only in XMAR

3 securities, 100% of XMAR by weight

  • 2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.50106.47%
  • 2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 648.5817.70%
  • 2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 648.581.07%

Only in XSEP

3 securities, 100% of XSEP by weight

  • 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.6997.32%
  • 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 761.697.91%
  • 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 761.775.18%

Weight gaps

XMAR and XSEP share no securities.

All 5 XMAR holdings⁠All 5 XSEP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

XMAR vs XSEP Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • XMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • XSEP 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • XMAR 0.85%
  • XSEP 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XMAR $16,199XSEP $16,199

Year by year

YearXMARXSEP
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%XMAR
  • 0.85%XSEP
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
  • Median 0.85%

XMAR 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

XSEP 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

XMAR vs XSEP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
XMAR None
XSEP None

Distribution history

XMARAll XMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XSEPAll XSEP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XMAR vs XSEP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
XMAR 3.3%, betterXSEP 4.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
XMAR 1.96, betterXSEP 1.23
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
XMAR −7.3%since Mar 2023XSEP −9.2%since Sep 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
XMAR 0.23XSEP 0.35

XMAR and XSEP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • XMARBvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSEPCvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMARBvsXJANC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSEPCvsXJANC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMARBvsXJUNB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSEPCvsXJUNB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.