Skip to content
etf.net

CTJL vs PSCX

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

CTJLCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

PSCXBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTJL −0.19pt a year

CTJL0.30%PSCX0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSCX 1.1×the volume

CTJL920PSCX998

CTJL vs PSCX Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.9%CTJL+1.9%PSCX

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTJL +0.9%. PSCX +1.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%1.5%2.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTJL 0.30%, better
PSCX 0.49%
Fund size
CTJL $1M
PSCX $47M
1Y total return
CTJL No data
PSCX +10.2%
Holdings
CTJL 4
PSCX 3
Avg volume (30D)
CTJL 920 sh
PSCX 998 sh, better
NAV per share
CTJL $25.44
PSCX $33.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTJL: Cost 97, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. PSCX: Cost 81, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings not scored, Durability 28.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTJL, PSCX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTJLPSCX
Cost30% weightA97HigherA81
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51B56Higher
Tradability15% weightF12C47Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF2D28Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTJL and PSCX are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

PSCX ranks 1st and CTJL 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 16CDMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MayScore 41
  4. Rank 17CCTJLCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 17CCTJNCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTJLCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

PSCXBPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

In short

CTJL No data

PSCX A 25% deep buffer against the S&P 500, reset every January, for 0.49% a year, well under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group. The trade-off: a cap on the upside, set fresh each outcome period.

Stated mandate

CTJL No data

PSCX The fund seeks to match the pre-fee returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.

Why people hold it

CTJL No data

  • PSCX At 0.49%, one of the cheaper ways to buy a deep buffer: cohort peers DMAR (0.85%) and UFEB (0.79%) charge more for a similar job.
  • The cushion is deep. The structure aims to absorb the first 25% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over an approximately one-year outcome period.paceretfs.com
  • Pacer runs the same recipe on a quarterly calendar (PSCW in April, PSCQ in October), so the January reset is a choice of start date, not the only option.
  • Live since 2020, so the strategy has cycled through several full outcome periods, not one flattering stretch.

Worth knowing

CTJL No data

  • PSCX Upside is capped. A new cap is set at the start of each outcome period, and a deeper buffer generally comes with a lower ceiling.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are measured over the full outcome period and stated before fees. Buy mid-period and your own cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.paceretfs.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on mainstream index ETFs.

Full CTJL profile⁠

Full PSCX profile⁠

CTJL vs PSCX Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTJL vs PSCX Cost

Overpaying PSCX vs CTJL

$3,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTJL 0.30%

    $6,149

  • PSCX 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTJL 0.30%
  • PSCX 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSCX $9,792CTJL $6,149

Year by year

YearCTJLPSCXOverpaying
10$545$883$338
20$2,113$3,394$1,281
30$6,149$9,792$3,643

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTJL, cheaper
  • 0.49%PSCX
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTJL cheapest of 19 funds

PSCX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

CTJL vs PSCX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTJL None
PSCX None

Distribution history

CTJLAll CTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSCXAll PSCX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTJL vs PSCX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTJL No dataPSCX 6.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTJL No dataPSCX 1.45
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTJL No dataPSCX −10.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTJL 0.00PSCX 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • CTJLCvsUFEBB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSCXBvsUFEBB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTJLCvsPSCQB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSCXBvsPSCQB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTJLCvsDFEBC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSCXBvsDFEBC

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.