Skip to content

CTJL vs UFEB

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

CTJLCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

UFEBBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CTJL −0.49pt a year

CTJL0.30%UFEB0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

UFEB 35.6×the volume

CTJL920UFEB32.8K

CTJL vs UFEB Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.9%CTJL+1.6%UFEB

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTJL +0.9%. UFEB +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%2%2.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTJL 0.30%, better
UFEB 0.79%
Fund size
CTJL $1M
UFEB $167M
1Y total return
CTJL No data
UFEB +9.7%
Holdings
CTJL 4
UFEB 3
Avg volume (30D)
CTJL 920 sh
UFEB 32.8K sh, better
NAV per share
CTJL $25.44
UFEB $39.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTJL: Cost 97, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. UFEB: Cost 67, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings not scored, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTJL, UFEB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTJLUFEB
Cost30% weightA97HigherB67
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51B64Higher
Tradability15% weightF12B63Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF2C45Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTJL and UFEB are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

UFEB ranks 1st and CTJL 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPSCQPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 16CDMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MayScore 41
  5. Rank 17CCTJLCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 17CCTJNCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

CTJL vs UFEB Holdings

How CTJL and UFEB differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CTJL and 0.0% of UFEB.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for CTJL.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CTJL and UFEB, widest gap first
CountryMore in CTJLMore in UFEB
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CTJL101.6%
  • UFEB102.7%

Securities held

  • CTJL3
  • UFEB3

Asset class

CTJL
Equity
UFEB
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CTJL3
  • In both0
  • Only in UFEB3

Only in CTJL

3 securities, 98.7% of CTJL by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 149.14 C76.40%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.25% 06/30/202719.52%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 708.43 P2.76%

Only in UFEB

3 securities, 100% of UFEB by weight

  • Spy 01/29/2027 6.89 C101.63%
  • Spy 01/29/2027 657.37 P0.72%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.32%

Weight gaps

CTJL and UFEB share no securities.

All CTJL holdings⁠All 6 UFEB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTJL vs UFEB Cost

Overpaying UFEB vs CTJL

$9,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTJL 0.30%

    $6,149

  • UFEB 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTJL 0.30%
  • UFEB 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530UFEB $15,174CTJL $6,149

Year by year

YearCTJLUFEBOverpaying
10$545$1,405$860
20$2,113$5,331$3,218
30$6,149$15,174$9,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTJL, cheaper
  • 0.79%UFEB
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTJL cheapest of 19 funds

UFEB 7th cheapest of 19 funds

CTJL vs UFEB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTJL None
UFEB None

Distribution history

CTJLAll CTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UFEBAll UFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTJL vs UFEB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTJL No dataUFEB 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTJL No dataUFEB 1.43
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTJL No dataUFEB −9.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTJL 0.00UFEB 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • CTJLCvsPSCXB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UFEBBvsPSCXB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTJLCvsPSCQB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UFEBBvsPSCQB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTJLCvsDFEBC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UFEBBvsDFEBC

    Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.