UFEB ranks 1st and CTJL 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
CTJL vs UFEB
0.0%by weight
CTJL −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
UFEB 35.6×the volume
92032.8K
CTJL vs UFEB Performance
+0.9%+1.6%
- CTJL 0.30%, better
- UFEB 0.79%
- CTJL $1M
- UFEB $167M
- CTJL
- UFEB +9.7%
- CTJL 4
- UFEB 3
- CTJL 920 sh
- UFEB 32.8K sh, better
- CTJL $25.44
- UFEB $39.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTJL | UFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | F12 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F2 | C45Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. CTJL and UFEB are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CTJL vs UFEB Holdings
How CTJL and UFEB differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CTJL and 0.0% of UFEB.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CTJL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CTJLMore in UFEB | CTJL | UFEB |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CTJL101.6%
- UFEB102.7%
- CTJL3
- UFEB3
Asset class
- CTJL
- Equity
- UFEB
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CTJL3
- In both0
- Only in UFEB3
Only in CTJL
3 securities, 98.7% of CTJL by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 149.14 C76.40%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.25% 06/30/202719.52%
- Spy 06/30/2027 708.43 P2.76%
Only in UFEB
3 securities, 100% of UFEB by weight
- Spy 01/29/2027 6.89 C101.63%
- Spy 01/29/2027 657.37 P0.72%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.32%
Weight gaps
CTJL and UFEB share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTJL vs UFEB Cost
Overpaying UFEB vs CTJL
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTJL 0.30%
$6,149
UFEB 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTJL | UFEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CTJL, cheaper
- 0.79%UFEB
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
CTJL cheapest of 19 funds
UFEB 7th cheapest of 19 funds
CTJL vs UFEB Dividends
- CTJL None
- UFEB None
Distribution history
CTJL vs UFEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTJL UFEB 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTJL UFEB 1.43
- Worst fall
- CTJL UFEB −9.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CTJL 0.00UFEB 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.