Skip to content
etf.net

CTJL vs PSCQ

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

CTJLCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

PSCQBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTJL −0.19pt a year

CTJL0.30%PSCQ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSCQ 2.7×the volume

CTJL920PSCQ2.47K

CTJL vs PSCQ Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.9%CTJL+2.2%PSCQ

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTJL +0.9%. PSCQ +2.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTJL 0.30%, better
PSCQ 0.49%
Fund size
CTJL $1M
PSCQ $49M
1Y total return
CTJL No data
PSCQ +9.8%
Holdings
CTJL 4
PSCQ 3
Avg volume (30D)
CTJL 920 sh
PSCQ 2.47K sh, better
NAV per share
CTJL $25.44
PSCQ $32.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTJL: Cost 97, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. PSCQ: Cost 81, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 17.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTJL, PSCQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTJLPSCQ
Cost30% weightA97HigherA81
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51HigherC49
Tradability15% weightF12C48Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF2F17Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTJL and PSCQ are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

PSCQ ranks 3rd and CTJL 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPSCQPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4CDFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  5. Rank 16CDMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MayScore 41
  6. Rank 17CCTJLCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  7. Rank 17CCTJNCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTJLCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

PSCQBPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

In short

CTJL No data

PSCQ A deep buffer with a deductible: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then the next 25 points get cushioned, up to a cap reset each October. At 0.49% a year, it is a low-cost way to run that trade.

Stated mandate

CTJL No data

PSCQ The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.

Why people hold it

CTJL No data

  • PSCQ 0.49% a year, at the cheap end of the SPY deep-buffer group. In a capped strategy, fees come straight out of the upside you are allowed to keep.
  • Real depth of cushion: underlying losses from 5% down to 30% are absorbed by the options package, 25 percentage points of protection across a full one-year outcome period.paceretfs.com
  • October start date. Pacer runs the same conservative recipe in January, April and July windows, so you choose which twelve months (and which cap) you live with.
  • Plain plumbing: FLEX options on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, no stock picking, no leverage. It sits in the upper half of its deep-buffer peer group.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

CTJL No data

  • PSCQ The cap is the price of the cushion. Upside stops at a level set when the October period begins, so a roaring S&P year leaves money on the table.
  • The 5% to 30% math is built for holders of the full period. Buy mid-period and your effective buffer and cap depend on the price you pay.paceretfs.com
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can run wider than on big index ETFs. It holds options, not dividend payers, so income is not part of the design.

Full CTJL profile⁠

Full PSCQ profile⁠

CTJL vs PSCQ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTJL vs PSCQ Cost

Overpaying PSCQ vs CTJL

$3,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTJL 0.30%

    $6,149

  • PSCQ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTJL 0.30%
  • PSCQ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSCQ $9,792CTJL $6,149

Year by year

YearCTJLPSCQOverpaying
10$545$883$338
20$2,113$3,394$1,281
30$6,149$9,792$3,643

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTJL, cheaper
  • 0.49%PSCQ
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTJL cheapest of 19 funds

PSCQ 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

CTJL vs PSCQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTJL None
PSCQ None

Distribution history

CTJLAll CTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSCQAll PSCQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTJL vs PSCQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTJL No dataPSCQ 6.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTJL No dataPSCQ 1.30
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTJL No dataPSCQ −9.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTJL 0.00PSCQ 0.40

Popular comparisons

  • CTJLCvsPSCXB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSCQBvsPSCXB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTJLCvsUFEBB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSCQBvsUFEBB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTJLCvsDFEBC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSCQBvsDFEBC

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.