UJAN ranks 1st and CTMA 13th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.
CTMA vs UJAN
0.0%by weight
CTMA −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
UJAN 18.9×the volume
1.86K35.2K
CTMA vs UJAN Performance
+0.8%+1.8%
- CTMA 0.30%, better
- UJAN 0.79%
- CTMA $2M
- UJAN $250M
- CTMA
- UJAN +9.3%
- CTMA 4
- UJAN 3
- CTMA 1.86K sh
- UJAN 35.2K sh, better
- CTMA $25.79
- UJAN $46.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTMA | UJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | F2 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F2 | A76Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
Same Category. CTMA and UJAN are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CTMA vs UJAN Holdings
How CTMA and UJAN differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CTMA and 0.0% of UJAN.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector98.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in CTMAMore in UJAN | CTMA | UJAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication | UJAN +1.0 points | 8.9% | 9.9% |
| Technology | UJAN +0.8 points | 39.3% | 40.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | CTMA +0.4 points | 9.1% | 8.7% |
| Financials | CTMA +0.4 points | 11.7% | 11.3% |
| Health Care | CTMA +0.4 points | 9.8% | 9.4% |
| Energy | CTMA +0.3 points | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Consumer Staples | CTMA +0.3 points | 4.7% | 4.4% |
| Industrials | UJAN +0.1 points | 7.5% | 7.6% |
| Utilities | CTMA +0.1 points | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Materials | UJAN +0.1 points | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CTMAMore in UJAN | CTMA | UJAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CTMA102.4%
- UJAN102.7%
- CTMA3
- UJAN3
Asset class
- CTMA
- Equity
- UJAN
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CTMA3
- In both0
- Only in UJAN3
Only in CTMA
3 securities, 96.0% of CTMA by weight
- Spy 04/30/2027 144.74 C80.34%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.75% 04/30/202713.74%
- Spy 04/30/2027 687.52 P1.89%
Only in UJAN
3 securities, 100% of UJAN by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 6.81 C101.98%
- Spy 12/31/2026 647.82 P0.43%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.28%
Weight gaps
CTMA and UJAN share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTMA vs UJAN Cost
Overpaying UJAN vs CTMA
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTMA 0.30%
$6,149
UJAN 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTMA | UJAN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CTMA, cheaper
- 0.79%UJAN
- Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
- Median 0.79%
CTMA cheapest of 13 funds
UJAN 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
CTMA vs UJAN Dividends
- CTMA None
- UJAN None
Distribution history
CTMA vs UJAN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTMA UJAN 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTMA UJAN 1.40
- Worst fall
- CTMA UJAN −9.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CTMA 0.41UJAN 0.44
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.