UJUN ranks 2nd and CTMA 13th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.
CTMA vs UJUN
CTMA −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
UJUN 27.7×the volume
1.86K51.5K
CTMA vs UJUN Performance
+0.8%+1.1%
- CTMA 0.30%, better
- UJUN 0.79%
- CTMA $2M
- UJUN $183M
- CTMA
- UJUN +5.6%
- CTMA
- UJUN 0.00%
- CTMA 4
- UJUN 4
- CTMA 1.86K sh
- UJUN 51.5K sh, better
- CTMA $25.79
- UJUN $38.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTMA | UJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | F2 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | F2 | B58Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
Same Category. CTMA and UJUN are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CTMA vs UJUN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTMA vs UJUN Cost
Overpaying UJUN vs CTMA
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTMA 0.30%
$6,149
UJUN 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTMA | UJUN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CTMA, cheaper
- 0.79%UJUN
- Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
- Median 0.79%
CTMA cheapest of 13 funds
UJUN 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
CTMA vs UJUN Dividends
- CTMA
- UJUN 0.00%
- CTMA None
- UJUN None
Distribution history
CTMA vs UJUN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTMA UJUN 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTMA UJUN 1.20
- Worst fall
- CTMA UJUN −12.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CTMA 0.41UJUN 0.42
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.