Skip to content
etf.net

CTMA vs UOCT

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

CTMADCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October

UOCTCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTMA −0.49pt a year

CTMA0.30%UOCT0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

UOCT 23.6×the volume

CTMA1.86KUOCT43.8K

CTMA vs UOCT Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.8%CTMA+1.8%UOCT

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTMA +0.8%. UOCT +1.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTMA 0.30%, better
UOCT 0.79%
Fund size
CTMA $2M
UOCT $267M
1Y total return
CTMA No data
UOCT +9.2%
Yield (12M)
CTMA No data
UOCT 0.00%
Holdings
CTMA 4
UOCT 4
Avg volume (30D)
CTMA 1.86K sh
UOCT 43.8K sh, better
NAV per share
CTMA $25.79
UOCT $42.24
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTMA: Cost 51, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 2, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. UOCT: Cost 50, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 59, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTMA, UOCT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTMAUOCT
Cost30% weightC51HigherC50
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C42Higher
Tradability15% weightF2A72Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB59
Durability5% weightF2A78Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTMA and UOCT are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30%⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

UOCT ranks 2nd and CTMA 13th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BUJANInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 57
  2. Rank 2BUJUNInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - JuneScore 55
  3. Rank 2CUOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF OctoberScore 55
  4. Rank 2BUSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 12CUNOVInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 46
  6. Rank 13DCTMACorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 33

CTMA vs UOCT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTMA vs UOCT Cost

Overpaying UOCT vs CTMA

$9,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTMA 0.30%

    $6,149

  • UOCT 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTMA 0.30%
  • UOCT 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530UOCT $15,174CTMA $6,149

Year by year

YearCTMAUOCTOverpaying
10$545$1,405$860
20$2,113$5,331$3,218
30$6,149$15,174$9,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTMA, cheaper
  • 0.79%UOCT
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
  • Median 0.79%

CTMA cheapest of 13 funds

UOCT 2nd cheapest of 13 funds

CTMA vs UOCT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTMA No data
UOCT 0.00%
Payout (12M)
CTMA None
UOCT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

CTMAAll CTMA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UOCT1 paymentAll UOCT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.58. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502019

CTMA vs UOCT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTMA No dataUOCT 5.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTMA No dataUOCT 1.22
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTMA No dataUOCT −9.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTMA 0.41UOCT 0.41Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • CTMADvsUJANB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UOCTCvsUJANB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTMADvsUJUNB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UOCTCvsUJUNB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTMADvsUSEPB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UOCTCvsUSEPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.