UYG ranks 2nd and CWEB 86th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
CWEB vs UYG
UYG −0.34pt a year
1.27%0.93%
CWEB 37.1×the volume
641K17.3K
UYG +47.6pt
−38.2%+9.4%
CWEB vs UYG Performance
−91.0%+56.5%
- CWEB 1.27%
- UYG 0.93%, better
- CWEB $143M
- UYG $777M
- CWEB −68.0%
- UYG +11.5%, better
- CWEB 9.61%
- UYG 11.13%, better
- CWEB 8
- UYG 83
- CWEB 641K sh, better
- UYG 17.3K sh
- CWEB $15.72
- UYG $93.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CWEB | UYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F18 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A71 | A80Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. CWEB and UYG are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CWEBD
UYGA
In short
CWEB Two times the daily move of an index of China's overseas-listed internet names. Direxion has run it since 2016, and the leverage resets every day, so a week's result rarely equals twice the week.
UYG Listed in January 2007, a year before the banking crash, UYG targets 2x the daily move of the financial stocks in the S&P 500. A veteran of the leveraged shelf, priced at 0.93% with no fee waiver propping that number up.
Stated mandate
CWEB The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index's performance.
UYG UYG seeks pre-expense daily results equal to 2x the daily performance of the S&P Financial Select Sector Index. It is designed to provide magnified financials-sector exposure on a daily basis.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CWEB vs UYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CWEB vs UYG Cost
Overpaying CWEB vs UYG
$5,379
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CWEB 1.27%
$22,918
UYG 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CWEB | UYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,214 | $1,644 | $570 |
| 20 | $8,220 | $6,199 | $2,021 |
| 30 | $22,918 | $17,539 | $5,379 |
- 1.27%CWEB
- 0.93%UYG, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
UYG 29th cheapest of 95 funds
CWEB 89th cheapest of 95 funds
CWEB vs UYG Dividends
- CWEB 9.61%
- UYG 11.13%, better
- CWEB $1.51
- UYG $10.38
- CWEB $0.07
- UYG $0.09
- CWEB Sep 22, 2026
- UYG Sep 23, 2026
- CWEB Sep 29, 2026
- UYG Sep 29, 2026
- CWEB Quarterly
- UYG Quarterly
Distribution history
CWEB vs UYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CWEB
- UYG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CWEB 64.2%UYG 30.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CWEB −0.10UYG 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- CWEB −92.3%UYG −47.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CWEB 1.28UYG 1.58
Popular comparisons
- 1.27% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.27% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.27% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.