QLD ranks 1st and DDM 4th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
DDM vs QLD
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.95%0.89%
QLD 22.4×the volume
185K4.15M
QLD +12.7pt
+19.2%+31.9%
DDM vs QLD Performance
+68.8%+97.9%
- DDM 0.95%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- DDM $507M
- QLD $13.3B
- DDM +13.4%, better
- QLD +10.7%
- DDM 0.98%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- DDM 34
- QLD 113
- DDM 185K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- DDM $62.99
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDM | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A95Higher |
| Risk | A79Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | A93 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A79 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DDM and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDMB
QLDA
In short
DDM The Dow dates to 1896. DDM is the only ETF built to double its daily move: 2x the Dow Jones Industrial Average, reset every single day, for 0.95% a year, running since 2006.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
DDM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDM vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDM vs QLD Cost
Overpaying DDM vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDM 0.95%
$17,869
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDM | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,576 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,953 | $369 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $16,872 | $997 |
- 0.95%DDM
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
DDM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
DDM vs QLD Dividends
- DDM 0.98%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- DDM $0.62
- QLD $0.12
- DDM $0.15
- QLD $0.03
- DDM Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- DDM Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- DDM Quarterly
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
DDM vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DDM
- QLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DDM 24.6%, betterQLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DDM 0.96QLD 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- DDM −40.2%, betterQLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DDM 1.74QLD 2.46
DDM and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
