Skip to content

DECT vs XTR

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF

DECTBCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTR −0.49pt a year

DECT0.74%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

DECT 19.8×the volume

DECT32.4KXTR1.64K

3Y return · a year

XTR +3.0pt

DECT+16.2%XTR+19.2%

DECT vs XTR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.2%DECT+7.9%XTR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DECT +11.2%. XTR +7.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DECT 0.74%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
DECT $38M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
DECT +11.2%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
DECT 0.00%
XTR 16.45%, better
Holdings
DECT 2
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
DECT 32.4K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
DECT $40.72
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DECT: Cost 68, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 47, Durability 47. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for DECT, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDECTXTR
Cost30% weightB68A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC42HigherF18
Tradability15% weightB67HigherF13
Holdings10% weightC47A85Higher
Durability5% weightC47HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DECT and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

DECT ranks 18th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 16BSTENiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETFScore 59
  2. Rank 18BDECTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 18BJUNTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DECTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

DECT A December-dated buffer fund built on SPY's own share price, not the index behind it. It absorbs the first 10% of a year's decline in exchange for a cap on the upside, then resets every December 1.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

DECT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each annual outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses. It uses FLEX Options referencing that ETF.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • DECT The deal is written into the prospectus, not left to a manager's judgment: buffer the first 10% of the reference ETF's price loss over a one-year outcome period, capped on the upside, reset each December 1.
  • A registered 1940 Act ETF holding FLEX options on SPY, so the payoff shape comes in an exchange-traded wrapper rather than a bank-issued note.
  • At 0.74% a year it runs slightly under the typical shallow-buffer fund, and cost is one of its stronger suits in a crowded field where fees are the main separator.
  • Part of AllianzIM's dated ladder, which lets the December series be paired with other start months. Its six-month siblings (SIXD, SIXJ, SIXZ) carry the same fee but reset twice a year.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • DECT Thinly traded compared with the giants of the buffer world, so bid-ask spread and order size matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • The stated 10% buffer and the cap apply to a full outcome period. Buy partway through and you inherit whatever protection and upside room are left, which can be more or less.
  • The target is SPY's share-price return, so dividends from the underlying stocks are not part of the payoff, and the fund itself has not been making distributions.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full DECT profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

DECT vs XTR Holdings

As of

How DECT and XTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DECT and 0.0% of XTR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in DECT and XTR, widest gap first
SectorMore in DECTMore in XTR
TechnologyXTR +1.2 points
CommunicationXTR +1.1 points
Health CareDECT +0.6 points
FinancialsDECT +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryDECT +0.4 points
Consumer StaplesDECT +0.4 points
EnergyDECT +0.3 points
UtilitiesDECT +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
MaterialsXTR +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DECT and XTR, widest gap first
CountryMore in DECTMore in XTR
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DECT100.4%
  • XTR38.9%

Securities held

  • DECT2
  • XTR505

Asset class

DECT
Equity
XTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DECT2
  • In both0
  • Only in XTR505

Only in DECT

2 securities, 100% of DECT by weight

  • Spy 11/30/2026 5.06 C100.23%
  • Spy 11/30/2026 683.32 P0.15%

Only in XTR

505 securities, 99.9% of XTR by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp8.11%
  • Apple Inc7.37%
  • Microsoft Corp5.95%

Weight gaps

DECT and XTR share no securities.

All 5 DECT holdings⁠All 503 XTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DECT vs XTR Cost

Overpaying DECT vs XTR

$9,148

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DECT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DECT 0.74%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530DECT $14,307XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearDECTXTROverpaying
10$1,319$455$864
20$5,015$1,769$3,246
30$14,307$5,159$9,148

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%DECT
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

DECT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

DECT vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DECT 0.00%
XTR 16.45%, better
Payout (12M)
DECT None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
DECT No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
DECT No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
DECT No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
DECT No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

DECT1 paymentAll DECT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jan 16, 2024 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD
XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

DECT vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DECT 8.3%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DECT 1.33, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DECT −13.3%since Dec 2022XTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DECT 0.69XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • DECTBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECTBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.