EDIV ranks 1st and DEM 4th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Dividend Index Category.
DEM vs EDIV
EDIV −0.14pt a year
0.63%0.49%
DEM 2.4×the volume
231K98K
DEM +0.6pt
+8.6%+8.0%
DEM vs EDIV Performance
+59.3%+70.9%
- DEM 0.63%
- EDIV 0.49%, better
- DEM $3.98B
- EDIV $1.17B
- DEM +18.8%, better
- EDIV +9.2%
- DEM 3.40%
- EDIV 4.34%, better
- DEM 559
- EDIV 127
- DEM 231K sh, better
- EDIV 98K sh
- DEM $52.83
- EDIV $40.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DEM | EDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | B66Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A82 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | B67 | A70Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | A74 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DEM and EDIV are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DEMB
EDIVA
In short
DEM One of the original emerging-market dividend ETFs (2007). DEM ranks EM payers by yield, keeps only the top slice, then weights them by the actual dollars of dividends they pay. Income-first EM, not market-cap EM.
EDIV Running since 2011, EDIV screens emerging-market dividend payers on risk-adjusted yield, dividend-growth stability and profitability, then applies diversification limits. Quality of the dividend over raw yield, for 0.49% a year.
Stated mandate
DEM The fund seeks to track high-dividend-yielding companies in emerging markets and provides targeted emerging-market all-cap equity exposure.
EDIV The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, which selects emerging-market stocks using risk-adjusted yield, dividend-growth stability, profitability, and diversification requirements.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DEM vs EDIV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DEM vs EDIV Cost
Overpaying DEM vs EDIV
$2,567
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DEM 0.63%
$12,359
EDIV 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DEM | EDIV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $883 | $245 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $3,394 | $917 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $9,792 | $2,567 |
- 0.63%DEM
- 0.49%EDIV, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.59%
EDIV 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
DEM 8th cheapest of 10 funds
DEM vs EDIV Dividends
- DEM 3.40%
- EDIV 4.34%, better
- DEM $1.80
- EDIV $1.75
- DEM $0.77
- EDIV $0.67
- DEM Sep 25, 2026
- EDIV Sep 21, 2026
- DEM Sep 29, 2026
- EDIV Sep 23, 2026
- DEM Quarterly
- EDIV Quarterly
Distribution history
DEM vs EDIV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DEM
- EDIV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DEM 10.0%EDIV 9.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DEM 1.29, betterEDIV 1.20
- Worst fall
- DEM −27.1%, betterEDIV −28.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DEM 0.73EDIV 0.72
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.