Skip to content

DFAL vs SASS

Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF

DFALACboe

M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF

SASSDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

DFAL −0.63pt a year

DFAL0.12%SASS0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

DFAL 94.2×the volume

DFAL162KSASS1.73K

DFAL vs SASS Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+1.1%DFAL−1.2%SASS

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. DFAL +1.1%. SASS −1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%0%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DFAL 0.12%, better
SASS 0.75%
Fund size
DFAL $1.69B
SASS $76M
Holdings
DFAL 531
SASS 25
Avg volume (30D)
DFAL 162K sh, better
SASS 1.73K sh
NAV per share
DFAL $50.90
SASS $23.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFAL: Cost 93, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 59, Durability 59. SASS: Cost 21, Risk 21, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 35, Durability 30.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFAL, SASS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFALSASS
Cost30% weightA93HigherF21
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherF21
Tradability15% weightA72HigherD37
Holdings10% weightB59HigherD35
Durability5% weightB59HigherD30

Rank among US Active Contrarian Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFAL and SASS are both graded against the same 8 US Active Contrarian Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 8 ›

DFAL ranks 1st and SASS 8th of 8 funds in the US Active Contrarian Value Category.

  1. Rank 1ADFALDimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATVALT. Rowe Price Value ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 7DTCVTowle Small-Cap Value ETFScore 27
  4. Rank 8DSASSM.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETFScore 26

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFALADimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF

SASSDM.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF

In short

DFAL No data

SASS A high-conviction take on US value: M.D. Sass runs a concentrated book of large- and mid-cap value names measured against the Russell 1000 Value, leaning on stock picking rather than owning the whole index.

Stated mandate

DFAL No data

SASS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, high-conviction U.S. equity strategy focused primarily on large- and mid-capitalization value companies.

Why people hold it

DFAL No data

  • SASS Concentrated by design: a high-conviction set of large- and mid-cap value names, so the portfolio can look nothing like the Russell 1000 Value it measures itself against.
  • The mandate is narrow and legible: US stocks, value screen, actively picked. No overseas drift, no factor grab bag.
  • Standard 1940 Act fund plumbing, so shareholders get ordinary 1099 reporting rather than a K-1.

Worth knowing

DFAL No data

  • SASS The 0.75% expense ratio sits above the typical active US equity ETF, and the strongest-rated peers in the group (DFAU, AVLC) charge well under 0.20%.
  • Thinly traded on a modest asset base, so spreads can be wider than in megacap index funds. Limit orders matter more here.
  • Concentration cuts both ways: with few holdings, one name's stumble moves the whole fund. It launched in 2026, so the live record is short.

Full DFAL profile⁠

Full SASS profile⁠

DFAL vs SASS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFAL vs SASS Cost

Overpaying SASS vs DFAL

$11,962

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFAL 0.12%

    $2,520

  • SASS 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFAL 0.12%
  • SASS 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SASS $14,482DFAL $2,520

Year by year

YearDFALSASSOverpaying
10$220$1,336$1,116
20$859$5,078$4,219
30$2,520$14,482$11,962

Expense ratio

  • 0.12%DFAL, cheaper
  • 0.75%SASS
  • Middle half of US Active Contrarian Value funds
  • Median 0.54%

DFAL cheapest of 8 funds

SASS 7th cheapest of 8 funds

DFAL vs SASS Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
DFAL No data
SASS None
Last payment
DFAL $0.09
SASS No data
Ex-dividend
DFAL Sep 22, 2026
SASS No data
Paid on
DFAL Sep 24, 2026
SASS No data
Frequency
DFAL Irregular
SASS No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

DFALIrregular · 1 paymentAll DFAL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2026 YTD. Sep 22, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
SASSAll SASS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DFAL vs SASS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFAL 0.90SASS 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • DFALAvsTVALA

    Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF · T. Rowe Price Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SASSDvsTVALA

    M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF · T. Rowe Price Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFALAvsCSTKB

    Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF · Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SASSDvsCSTKB

    M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF · Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFALAvsBKDVB

    Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF · BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SASSDvsBKDVB

    M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF · BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.