Skip to content

BKDV vs SASS

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF

BKDVBNYSE Arca

M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF

SASSDNYSE Arca

Overlap

7.3%by weight

Expense ratio

BKDV −0.15pt a year

BKDV0.60%SASS0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

BKDV 284.8×the volume

BKDV491KSASS1.73K

BKDV vs SASS Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+1.8%BKDV−1.2%SASS

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. BKDV +1.8%. SASS −1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%0%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BKDV 0.60%, better
SASS 0.75%
Fund size
BKDV $2.29B
SASS $76M
1Y total return
BKDV +24.4%
SASS No data
Yield (12M)
BKDV 0.52%
SASS No data
Holdings
BKDV 78
SASS 25
Avg volume (30D)
BKDV 491K sh, better
SASS 1.73K sh
NAV per share
BKDV $34.69
SASS $23.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BKDV: Cost 44, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 74, Holdings 59, Durability 75. SASS: Cost 21, Risk 21, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 35, Durability 30.
Pillar letters and Scores for BKDV, SASS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBKDVSASS
Cost30% weightC44HigherF21
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB67HigherF21
Tradability15% weightA74HigherD37
Holdings10% weightB59HigherD35
Durability5% weightA75HigherD30

Rank among US Active Contrarian Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BKDV and SASS are both graded against the same 8 US Active Contrarian Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 8 ›

BKDV ranks 4th and SASS 8th of 8 funds in the US Active Contrarian Value Category.

  1. Rank 1ADFALDimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATVALT. Rowe Price Value ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3BCSTKInvesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 4BBKDVBNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 5CVSLUApplied Finance Valuation Large Cap ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 7DTCVTowle Small-Cap Value ETFScore 27
  7. Rank 8DSASSM.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETFScore 26

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BKDVBBNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF

SASSDM.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF

In short

BKDV BNY Mellon's 2024 swing at active value: roughly 90 hand-picked US stocks, priced below what the typical active equity fund charges. A young fund with a very old asset manager behind it.

SASS A high-conviction take on US value: M.D. Sass runs a concentrated book of large- and mid-cap value names measured against the Russell 1000 Value, leaning on stock picking rather than owning the whole index.

Stated mandate

BKDV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and invests principally in common stocks.

SASS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, high-conviction U.S. equity strategy focused primarily on large- and mid-capitalization value companies.

Why people hold it

  • BKDV At 0.60% a year, it undercuts the 0.65% median for active US equity funds. Not index-cheap, but you aren't paying a premium for the stock picking.
  • Roughly 90 holdings, so every name has to earn its slot. This is a concentrated value book chasing long-term capital appreciation, not a closet index wearing a value label.
  • Sits in the top quartile of its active US equity peer group, helped by downside behavior that has been steadier than most rivals over its short life.
  • Already a billion-dollar-plus fund despite launching in 2024, backed by one of the oldest names in US asset management.
  • SASS Concentrated by design: a high-conviction set of large- and mid-cap value names, so the portfolio can look nothing like the Russell 1000 Value it measures itself against.
  • The mandate is narrow and legible: US stocks, value screen, actively picked. No overseas drift, no factor grab bag.
  • Standard 1940 Act fund plumbing, so shareholders get ordinary 1099 reporting rather than a K-1.

Worth knowing

  • BKDV Launched November 2024. The risk picture rests on about a year of live data, and short records tell you less than long ones.
  • Systematic peers cost a fraction of this: DFAU charges 0.12%, AVLC 0.15%. The active premium here is several times their fee.
  • Moderately traded rather than one of the busiest tickers in the category, so spreads can run wider than on big index products.
  • SASS The 0.75% expense ratio sits above the typical active US equity ETF, and the strongest-rated peers in the group (DFAU, AVLC) charge well under 0.20%.
  • Thinly traded on a modest asset base, so spreads can be wider than in megacap index funds. Limit orders matter more here.
  • Concentration cuts both ways: with few holdings, one name's stumble moves the whole fund. It launched in 2026, so the live record is short.

Full BKDV profile⁠

Full SASS profile⁠

BKDV vs SASS Holdings

How BKDV and SASS differ

Overlap by weight

7.3%

Shared holdings make up 14.0% of SASS and 7.3% of BKDV.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both7.3%
  • Countryby domicile99.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for SASS.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BKDV and SASS, widest gap first
CountryMore in BKDVMore in SASS
United StatesSASS +0.6 points
SwitzerlandBKDV +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BKDV34.8%
  • SASS54.0%

Securities held

  • BKDV78
  • SASS23

Asset class

BKDV
Equity
SASS
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BKDV75
  • In both3
  • Only in SASS20

Only in BKDV

75 securities, 92.8% of BKDV by weight

  • Microsoft Corp5.84%
  • Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money M3.99%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc-Cl B3.66%

Only in SASS

20 securities, 82.4% of SASS by weight

  • Primo Brands Corp6.02%
  • Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc5.33%
  • Ares Management Corp5.19%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BKDV and SASS, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BKDVMore in SASS
Capital One Financial CorpCOFSASS +5.06 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNSASS +1.43 points
Agilent Technologies IncASASS +0.18 points

All 79 BKDV holdings⁠All SASS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BKDV vs SASS Cost

Overpaying SASS vs BKDV

$2,665

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BKDV 0.60%

    $11,817

  • SASS 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BKDV 0.60%
  • SASS 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SASS $14,482BKDV $11,817

Year by year

YearBKDVSASSOverpaying
10$1,076$1,336$260
20$4,116$5,078$962
30$11,817$14,482$2,665

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%BKDV, cheaper
  • 0.75%SASS
  • Middle half of US Active Contrarian Value funds
  • Median 0.54%

BKDV 5th cheapest of 8 funds

SASS 7th cheapest of 8 funds

BKDV vs SASS Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
BKDV 0.52%
SASS No data
Payout (12M)
BKDV $0.18
SASS None
Last payment
BKDV $0.18
SASS No data
Ex-dividend
BKDV Dec 29, 2025
SASS No data
Paid on
BKDV Jan 2, 2026
SASS No data
Frequency
BKDV Annual
SASS No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

BKDVAnnual · 2 paymentsAll BKDV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2024 $0.07; Dec 29, 2025 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
SASSAll SASS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BKDV vs SASS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BKDV 11.9%since Dec 2024SASS No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BKDV 0.94since Dec 2024SASS No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BKDV −15.5%since Nov 2024SASS No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BKDV 0.73SASS 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • BKDVBvsDFALA

    BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SASSDvsDFALA

    M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BKDVBvsTVALA

    BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF · T. Rowe Price Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SASSDvsTVALA

    M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF · T. Rowe Price Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BKDVBvsCSTKB

    BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF · Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SASSDvsCSTKB

    M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF · Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.