Skip to content

DFEB vs DMAY

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

DFEBCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May

DMAYCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

DFEB0.85%DMAY0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

DFEB 1.4×the volume

DFEB13.6KDMAY9.56K

5Y return · a year

DFEB +1.3pt

DFEB+8.1%DMAY+6.8%

DFEB vs DMAY Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+47.8%DFEB+38.8%DMAY

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. DFEB +47.8%. DMAY +38.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%20%30%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DFEB 0.85%
DMAY 0.85%
Fund size
DFEB $456M
DMAY $391M
1Y total return
DFEB +10.2%, better
DMAY +7.2%
Holdings
DFEB 3
DMAY 3
Avg volume (30D)
DFEB 13.6K sh, better
DMAY 9.56K sh
NAV per share
DFEB $51.65
DMAY $47.79
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFEB: Cost 31, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 63, Durability 74. DMAY: Cost 31, Risk 31, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 67, Durability 72.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFEB, DMAY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFEBDMAY
Cost30% weightD31D31
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherD31
Tradability15% weightA77HigherC46
Holdings10% weightB63B67Higher
Durability5% weightA74HigherA72

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFEB and DMAY are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

DFEB ranks 4th and DMAY 16th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPSCQPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4CDFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  5. Rank 4CPSCWPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 15CDDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44
  7. Rank 16CDMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MayScore 41
  8. Rank 17CCTJLCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFEBCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

DMAYCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May

In short

DFEB A buffer with a deductible. DFEB lets the first 5% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust land on you, then covers the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets every February.

DMAY A deep buffer with a May start date. DMAY absorbs a 25-percentage-point band of losses in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each one-year outcome period, and in exchange you live under a cap that resets every May.

Stated mandate

DFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.87% upside cap, while protecting against Underlying ETF losses from -5% through -30% during the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.

DMAY The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to a 13.56% upside cap, while buffering specified losses over the current target-outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • DFEB Deep coverage where it hurts: the fund targets protection against reference-ETF losses from -5% through -30%, a 25-point band, over each one-year outcome period.
  • One of twelve monthly vintages on the same reference ETF (DMAR, DJUN, DDEC and the rest), so entries can be laddered across the calendar instead of hinging on one start date.
  • Running since 2020, it has rolled through several full outcome periods, and it sits in the upper half of its deep-buffer peer group.
  • At 0.85%, the fee sits right at the median for deep-buffer funds tracking this kind of strategy.
  • DMAY Twenty-five percentage points of buffer against declines in the reference fund per outcome period. That is the deep end of the buffer menu, not the usual thin cushion.ftportfolios.com
  • The thing being buffered is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, price return. No custom index to decode.ftportfolios.com
  • One of twelve monthly vintages First Trust runs on the same deep-buffer recipe, DJAN through DDEC, every one at 0.85%. Start dates can be laddered without changing the fee math.
  • Running since 2020, so the structure has been through real market weather rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • DFEB The trade for depth: you absorb the first 5% of losses yourself, and gains stop at a cap that is reset each February from option pricing at the time.
  • It tracks price return only, so the reference ETF's dividends are not passed along, and the fund has not been paying distributions.
  • Cheaper deep-buffer options exist (PSCX and PSCW run 0.49%), and DFEB trades lightly, so limit orders are the sane way in and out.
  • DMAY 0.85% sits right at the median for deep-buffer funds, but not the floor: the Pacer Swan SOS Conservative siblings (PSCX, PSCW, PSCQ) run 0.49%.
  • Price return only. Dividends paid inside the S&P 500 are not passed along, and income has not been part of the package here.
  • Trades lightly next to the biggest buffer funds, so execution deserves attention. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the reset-day terms.

Full DFEB profile⁠

Full DMAY profile⁠

DFEB vs DMAY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFEB vs DMAY Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFEB 0.85%

    $16,199

  • DMAY 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFEB 0.85%
  • DMAY 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DFEB $16,199DMAY $16,199

Year by year

YearDFEBDMAY
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DFEB
  • 0.85%DMAY
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

DFEB 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DMAY 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DFEB vs DMAY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
DFEB None
DMAY None

Distribution history

DFEBAll DFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DMAYAll DMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DFEB vs DMAY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DFEB
  • DMAY
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: DMAY −13.9% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFEB 6.1%, betterDMAY 6.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFEB 1.57, betterDMAY 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFEB −10.0%, betterDMAY −13.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFEB 0.50DMAY 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • DFEBCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMAYCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMAYCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMAYCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.