Skip to content

DFEB vs PSCW

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

DFEBCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF

PSCWCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSCW −0.36pt a year

DFEB0.85%PSCW0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

DFEB 28.3×the volume

DFEB13.6KPSCW482

3Y return · a year

DFEB +1.8pt

DFEB+14.6%PSCW+12.8%

DFEB vs PSCW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.2%DFEB+11.6%PSCW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DFEB +10.2%. PSCW +11.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DFEB 0.85%
PSCW 0.49%, better
Fund size
DFEB $456M
PSCW $62M
1Y total return
DFEB +10.2%
PSCW +11.6%, better
Holdings
DFEB 3
PSCW 3
Avg volume (30D)
DFEB 13.6K sh, better
PSCW 482 sh
NAV per share
DFEB $51.65
PSCW $30.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFEB: Cost 31, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 63, Durability 74. PSCW: Cost 81, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 9, Holdings not scored, Durability 27.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFEB, PSCW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFEBPSCW
Cost30% weightD31A81Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherB57
Tradability15% weightA77HigherF9
Holdings10% weightB63Not scored
Durability5% weightA74HigherD27

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFEB and PSCW are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

DFEB ranks 4th and PSCW 4th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPSCQPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4CDFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  5. Rank 4CPSCWPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 6CDJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFEBCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

PSCWCPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF

In short

DFEB A buffer with a deductible. DFEB lets the first 5% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust land on you, then covers the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets every February.

PSCW A 25% cushion against S&P 500 losses for 0.49%, well under the going rate in the deep-buffer aisle. Options do the work: index-like upside to a yearly cap, the first 25% of a decline absorbed, and the whole contract reset every April.

Stated mandate

DFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.87% upside cap, while protecting against Underlying ETF losses from -5% through -30% during the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.

PSCW The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while providing a downside risk-mitigation buffer over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • DFEB Deep coverage where it hurts: the fund targets protection against reference-ETF losses from -5% through -30%, a 25-point band, over each one-year outcome period.
  • One of twelve monthly vintages on the same reference ETF (DMAR, DJUN, DDEC and the rest), so entries can be laddered across the calendar instead of hinging on one start date.
  • Running since 2020, it has rolled through several full outcome periods, and it sits in the upper half of its deep-buffer peer group.
  • At 0.85%, the fee sits right at the median for deep-buffer funds tracking this kind of strategy.
  • PSCW Costs 0.49% while the typical deep-buffer peer sits nearer 0.85% (DMAR is 0.85%, UFEB 0.79%). When your upside is capped, the fee you skip is upside you keep.
  • Deep by design: the buffer aims to absorb the first 25% of the referenced S&P 500 ETF's decline, before fees, over an approximate one-year period starting each April 1.paceretfs.com
  • One reference asset, one buffer, one cap, built with FLEX options. No factor tilt, no stock picking, nothing to second-guess about what is inside.paceretfs.com
  • Sibling funds (PSCX, PSCQ, PSCJ) run the same conservative strategy on different reset months, so an April start date is a choice rather than the only option.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • DFEB The trade for depth: you absorb the first 5% of losses yourself, and gains stop at a cap that is reset each February from option pricing at the time.
  • It tracks price return only, so the reference ETF's dividends are not passed along, and the fund has not been paying distributions.
  • Cheaper deep-buffer options exist (PSCX and PSCW run 0.49%), and DFEB trades lightly, so limit orders are the sane way in and out.
  • PSCW Thinly traded next to the giants of the buffer world, so spreads can be wide and entry and exit deserve attention.
  • The cap is reset each April from whatever options pricing allows, and it is measured before fees. Buying mid-period means a different buffer and cap than the headline terms.paceretfs.com
  • Not an income vehicle: the structure has not paid a distribution over the past year, so results show up in the share price.

Full DFEB profile⁠

Full PSCW profile⁠

DFEB vs PSCW Holdings

As of

How DFEB and PSCW differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DFEB and 0.0% of PSCW.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in DFEB and PSCW, widest gap first
SectorMore in DFEBMore in PSCW
CommunicationDFEB +1.0 points
TechnologyDFEB +0.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryPSCW +0.4 points
FinancialsPSCW +0.4 points
Health CarePSCW +0.4 points
EnergyPSCW +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesPSCW +0.3 points
IndustrialsDFEB +0.1 points
UtilitiesPSCW +0.1 points
MaterialsDFEB +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DFEB and PSCW, widest gap first
CountryMore in DFEBMore in PSCW
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DFEB103.2%
  • PSCW109.5%

Securities held

  • DFEB2
  • PSCW2

Asset class

DFEB
Multi-Asset
PSCW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DFEB2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSCW2

Only in DFEB

2 securities, 100% of DFEB by weight

  • 2027-02-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.88101.76%
  • 2027-02-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 654.960.87%

Only in PSCW

2 securities, 100% of PSCW by weight

  • Spy 03/31/2027 7.15 C108.60%
  • Spy 03/31/2027 617.82 P0.68%

Weight gaps

DFEB and PSCW share no securities.

All 4 DFEB holdings⁠All 6 PSCW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFEB vs PSCW Cost

Overpaying DFEB vs PSCW

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFEB 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSCW 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFEB 0.85%
  • PSCW 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DFEB $16,199PSCW $9,792

Year by year

YearDFEBPSCWOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DFEB
  • 0.49%PSCW, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

PSCW 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

DFEB 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DFEB vs PSCW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
DFEB None
PSCW None

Distribution history

DFEBAll DFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSCWAll PSCW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DFEB vs PSCW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFEB 6.1%PSCW 6.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFEB 1.57, betterPSCW 1.29
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFEB −10.0%PSCW −11.9%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFEB 0.50PSCW 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • DFEBCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCWCvsPSCXB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCWCvsUFEBB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCWCvsPSCQB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.