PSCQ ranks 3rd and DFEB 4th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
DFEB vs PSCQ
PSCQ −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
DFEB 5.5×the volume
13.6K2.47K
PSCQ +0.9pt
+8.1%+9.0%
DFEB vs PSCQ Performance
+47.8%+53.5%
- DFEB 0.85%
- PSCQ 0.49%, better
- DFEB $456M
- PSCQ $49M
- DFEB +10.2%, better
- PSCQ +9.8%
- DFEB 3
- PSCQ 3
- DFEB 13.6K sh, better
- PSCQ 2.47K sh
- DFEB $51.65
- PSCQ $32.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFEB | PSCQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | A74Higher | F17 |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. DFEB and PSCQ are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFEBC
PSCQB
In short
DFEB A buffer with a deductible. DFEB lets the first 5% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust land on you, then covers the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets every February.
PSCQ A deep buffer with a deductible: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then the next 25 points get cushioned, up to a cap reset each October. At 0.49% a year, it is a low-cost way to run that trade.
Stated mandate
DFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.87% upside cap, while protecting against Underlying ETF losses from -5% through -30% during the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.
PSCQ The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFEB vs PSCQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFEB vs PSCQ Cost
Overpaying DFEB vs PSCQ
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFEB 0.85%
$16,199
PSCQ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFEB | PSCQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%DFEB
- 0.49%PSCQ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
PSCQ 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
DFEB 8th cheapest of 19 funds
DFEB vs PSCQ Dividends
- DFEB None
- PSCQ None
Distribution history
DFEB vs PSCQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFEB
- PSCQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFEB 6.1%PSCQ 6.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- DFEB 1.57, betterPSCQ 1.30
- Worst fall
- DFEB −10.0%PSCQ −9.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DFEB 0.50PSCQ 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.