PSCQ ranks 3rd and PSCW 4th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
PSCQ vs PSCW
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.49%0.49%
PSCQ 5.1×the volume
2.47K482
PSCQ +0.1pt
+12.9%+12.8%
PSCQ vs PSCW Performance
+9.8%+11.6%
- PSCQ 0.49%
- PSCW 0.49%
- PSCQ $49M
- PSCW $62M
- PSCQ +9.8%
- PSCW +11.6%, better
- PSCQ 3
- PSCW 3
- PSCQ 2.47K sh, better
- PSCW 482 sh
- PSCQ $32.20
- PSCW $30.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSCQ | PSCW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A81 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | C48Higher | F9 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F17 | D27Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. PSCQ and PSCW are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSCQB
PSCWC
In short
PSCQ A deep buffer with a deductible: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then the next 25 points get cushioned, up to a cap reset each October. At 0.49% a year, it is a low-cost way to run that trade.
PSCW A 25% cushion against S&P 500 losses for 0.49%, well under the going rate in the deep-buffer aisle. Options do the work: index-like upside to a yearly cap, the first 25% of a decline absorbed, and the whole contract reset every April.
Stated mandate
PSCQ The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.
PSCW The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while providing a downside risk-mitigation buffer over an approximate one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSCQ vs PSCW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSCQ vs PSCW Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,792
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSCQ 0.49%
$9,792
PSCW 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSCQ | PSCW |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $883 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $3,394 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $9,792 |
- 0.49%PSCQ
- 0.49%PSCW
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
PSCQ 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
PSCW 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
PSCQ vs PSCW Dividends
- PSCQ None
- PSCW None
Distribution history
PSCQ vs PSCW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSCQ 6.1%PSCW 6.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- PSCQ 1.30, betterPSCW 1.29
- Worst fall
- PSCQ −9.9%PSCW −11.9%
- Market sensitivity
- PSCQ 0.40PSCW 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.