FLJH ranks 3rd and DFJ 8th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
DFJ vs FLJH
FLJH −0.49pt a year
0.58%0.09%
FLJH 1.1×the volume
30.5K34.3K
FLJH +9.8pt
+10.8%+20.6%
DFJ vs FLJH Performance
+67.2%+154.7%
- DFJ 0.58%
- FLJH 0.09%, better
- DFJ $435M
- FLJH $201M
- DFJ +24.4%, better
- FLJH +22.5%
- DFJ 2.50%
- FLJH 6.17%, better
- DFJ 929
- FLJH 448
- DFJ 30.5K sh
- FLJH 34.3K sh, better
- DFJ $111.44
- FLJH $44.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFJ | FLJH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | A74 |
| Durability | B64Higher | C53 |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. DFJ and FLJH are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFJB
FLJHA
In short
DFJ Japan's small caps, filtered down to the ones that actually pay dividends. Running since 2006, holding roughly 800 names and sending cash out every quarter.
FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.
Stated mandate
DFJ The fund provides exposure to Japanese small-cap equities issued by companies that pay dividends.
FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFJ vs FLJH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFJ vs FLJH Cost
Overpaying DFJ vs FLJH
$9,555
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFJ 0.58%
$11,453
FLJH 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFJ | FLJH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $165 | $876 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $646 | $3,340 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $1,898 | $9,555 |
- 0.58%DFJ
- 0.09%FLJH, cheaper
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJH cheapest of 18 funds
DFJ 10th cheapest of 18 funds
DFJ vs FLJH Dividends
- DFJ 2.50%
- FLJH 6.17%, better
- DFJ $2.77
- FLJH $2.74
- DFJ $0.07
- FLJH $0.29
- DFJ Sep 25, 2026
- FLJH Jun 26, 2026
- DFJ Sep 29, 2026
- FLJH Jul 6, 2026
- DFJ Quarterly
- FLJH Twice a year
Distribution history
DFJ vs FLJH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFJ
- FLJH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFJ 13.5%FLJH 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFJ 1.11FLJH 1.59, better
- Worst fall
- DFJ −24.2%FLJH −20.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DFJ 0.83FLJH 0.62
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.