FLJH ranks 3rd and JPXN 5th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJH vs JPXN
FLJH −0.39pt a year
0.09%0.48%
FLJH 2.1×the volume
34.3K16.5K
FLJH +11.5pt
+20.7%+9.2%
FLJH vs JPXN Performance
+156.4%+55.0%
- FLJH 0.09%, better
- JPXN 0.48%
- FLJH $201M
- JPXN $166M
- FLJH +21.9%, better
- JPXN +17.7%
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- JPXN 2.74%
- FLJH 448
- JPXN 402
- FLJH 34.3K sh, better
- JPXN 16.5K sh
- FLJH $44.77
- JPXN $100.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJH | JPXN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B68 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B62Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | C52 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A82Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A70Higher |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJH and JPXN are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJHA
JPXNA
In short
FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.
JPXN Most Japan ETFs just buy Tokyo. JPXN follows the JPX-Nikkei 400, an index that screens for profitability and shareholder-oriented practices, making it the corporate-reform cut of Japan rather than plain country beta.
Stated mandate
FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.
JPXN JPXN seeks to follow an index of Japanese equities that applies profitability and shareholder-oriented practice screens. It is intended to provide targeted exposure to Japan as a single-country allocation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJH vs JPXN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJH vs JPXN Cost
Overpaying JPXN vs FLJH
$7,707
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJH 0.09%
$1,898
JPXN 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJH | JPXN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $865 | $700 |
| 20 | $646 | $3,328 | $2,682 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $9,605 | $7,707 |
- 0.09%FLJH, cheaper
- 0.48%JPXN
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJH cheapest of 18 funds
JPXN 6th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJH vs JPXN Dividends
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- JPXN 2.74%
- FLJH $2.74
- JPXN $2.75
- FLJH $0.29
- JPXN $0.64
- FLJH Jun 26, 2026
- JPXN Jun 15, 2026
- FLJH Jul 6, 2026
- JPXN Jun 18, 2026
- FLJH Twice a year
- JPXN Twice a year
Distribution history
FLJH vs JPXN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLJH
- JPXN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJH 12.5%JPXN 12.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJH 1.59, betterJPXN 1.21
- Worst fall
- FLJH −20.4%, betterJPXN −29.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FLJH 0.62JPXN 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.