DFLV ranks 4th and ECML 56th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs ECML
DFLV −0.74pt a year
0.21%0.95%
DFLV 171.3×the volume
658K3.84K
DFLV +6.3pt
+22.7%+16.4%
DFLV vs ECML Performance
+29.3%+26.2%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- ECML 0.95%
- DFLV $7.39B
- ECML $124M
- DFLV +29.3%, better
- ECML +26.2%
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- ECML 1.14%
- DFLV 336
- ECML 64
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- ECML 3.84K sh
- DFLV $41.80
- ECML $40.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | ECML |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F3 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A76Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | D28 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A74 |
| Durability | A83Higher | C50 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and ECML are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
ECMLD
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
ECML Value investing run through deep neural networks: Euclidean's models hunt cheap NYSE and Nasdaq names, screen out the ones likely to stay cheap, and hold 60 to 70 of them. Boutique quant, boutique price.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
ECML The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, quantitative and systematic strategy investing in U.S. equity securities that the Sub-Adviser considers undervalued and under-appreciated.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs ECML Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs ECML Cost
Overpaying ECML vs DFLV
$13,512
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
ECML 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | ECML | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $1,678 | $1,295 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $6,322 | $4,831 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $17,869 | $13,512 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.95%ECML
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
ECML 62nd cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs ECML Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- ECML 1.14%
- DFLV $0.57
- ECML $0.46
- DFLV $0.16
- ECML $0.46
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- ECML Dec 23, 2025
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- ECML Dec 24, 2025
- DFLV Quarterly
- ECML Annual
Distribution history
DFLV vs ECML Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%, betterECML 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38, betterECML 0.70
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%ECML −24.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80ECML 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.