WTV ranks 1st and ECML 56th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
ECML vs WTV
WTV −0.83pt a year
0.95%0.12%
WTV 43.6×the volume
3.84K167K
WTV +7.7pt
+16.4%+24.1%
ECML vs WTV Performance
+26.2%+20.9%
- ECML 0.95%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- ECML $124M
- WTV $3.33B
- ECML +26.2%, better
- WTV +20.9%
- ECML 1.14%
- WTV 2.00%, better
- ECML 64
- WTV 126
- ECML 3.84K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- ECML $40.35
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ECML | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D38 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C50 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. ECML and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ECMLD
WTVA
In short
ECML Value investing run through deep neural networks: Euclidean's models hunt cheap NYSE and Nasdaq names, screen out the ones likely to stay cheap, and hold 60 to 70 of them. Boutique quant, boutique price.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
ECML The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, quantitative and systematic strategy investing in U.S. equity securities that the Sub-Adviser considers undervalued and under-appreciated.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ECML vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ECML vs WTV Cost
Overpaying ECML vs WTV
$15,349
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ECML 0.95%
$17,869
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ECML | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $220 | $1,458 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $859 | $5,463 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $2,520 | $15,349 |
- 0.95%ECML
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
ECML 62nd cheapest of 64 funds
ECML vs WTV Dividends
- ECML 1.14%
- WTV 2.00%, better
- ECML $0.46
- WTV $2.14
- ECML $0.46
- WTV $0.55
- ECML Dec 23, 2025
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- ECML Dec 24, 2025
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- ECML Annual
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
ECML vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ECML 17.6%WTV 13.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ECML 0.70WTV 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- ECML −24.7%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ECML 0.76WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.