Skip to content

ECML vs SEIV

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

ECMLDNYSE Arca

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

SEIVACboe

Overlap

10.7%by weight

Expense ratio

SEIV −0.80pt a year

ECML0.95%SEIV0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

SEIV 36.7×the volume

ECML3.84KSEIV141K

3Y return · a year

SEIV +12.4pt

ECML+16.4%SEIV+28.8%

ECML vs SEIV Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+26.2%ECML+27.7%SEIV

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ECML +26.2%. SEIV +27.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ECML 0.95%
SEIV 0.15%, better
Fund size
ECML $124M
SEIV $1.62B
1Y total return
ECML +26.2%
SEIV +27.7%, better
Yield (12M)
ECML 1.14%
SEIV 1.57%, better
Holdings
ECML 64
SEIV 123
Avg volume (30D)
ECML 3.84K sh
SEIV 141K sh, better
NAV per share
ECML $40.35
SEIV $49.57
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ECML: Cost 3, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 28, Holdings 74, Durability 50. SEIV: Cost 98, Risk 65, Mission 82, Tradability 91, Holdings 76, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for ECML, SEIV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarECMLSEIV
Cost30% weightF3A98Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA82
Risk15% weightD38B65Higher
Tradability15% weightD28A91Higher
Holdings10% weightA74A76Higher
Durability5% weightC50A75Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ECML and SEIV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds
See all 64 ›

SEIV ranks 3rd and ECML 56th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 1AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 86
  3. Rank 3ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 4ADFLVDimensional US Large Cap Value ETFScore 84
  5. Rank 55DPRVSParnassus Value Select ETFScore 29
  6. Rank 56DECMLEuclidean Fundamental Value ETFScore 27
  7. Rank 57DEPSVHarbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV)Score 26

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ECMLDEuclidean Fundamental Value ETF

SEIVASEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

In short

ECML Value investing run through deep neural networks: Euclidean's models hunt cheap NYSE and Nasdaq names, screen out the ones likely to stay cheap, and hold 60 to 70 of them. Boutique quant, boutique price.

SEIV Active quant value stock-picking at an index-fund price. SEIV screens U.S. large caps for cheap valuations plus quality, momentum and low volatility, then runs a concentrated book of roughly 80 names for 0.15% a year.

Stated mandate

ECML The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, quantitative and systematic strategy investing in U.S. equity securities that the Sub-Adviser considers undervalued and under-appreciated.

SEIV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S. common stocks priced below fundamental valuation measures, using a quantitative, active stock-selection approach.

Why people hold it

  • ECML Two-sided machine learning: models estimate what a company is worth, and separately flag cheap stocks likely to keep disappointing, so value traps get screened out.euclideanetf.com
  • Concentrated by design, generally 60 to 70 US stocks. Each name carries real weight instead of being diluted across hundreds of holdings.euclideanetf.com
  • Fully systematic and rules-driven, so the process does not hinge on one manager's gut call. Financials are excluded from the universe altogether.euclideanetf.com
  • SEIV 0.15% a year for genuine active selection, against a 0.55% median in its U.S. value peer group. It matches the cheapest large-value quant funds rather than charging active prices.
  • Value is not the only screen. The model also weighs quality, momentum and low volatility, which is how a cheap-stock strategy tries to avoid the cheap-for-a-reason trap.
  • Other funds measured against the S&P 500 in this cohort charge far more (LSVD 0.40%, GSPY 0.50%, VNSE 1.34%). SEIV runs its version at 0.15%.
  • Sits among the strongest implementations in a crowded U.S. value field, and trades with enough regular activity to be workable for ordinary retail order sizes.

Worth knowing

  • ECML At 0.95% a year, it costs well above the roughly 0.55% typical for active US value ETFs, and many times what systematic peers like AVLV (0.15%) or DFLV (0.21%) charge.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Spreads can be wide, so limit orders matter more here than in a mega-cap index product.
  • Concentration plus a financials exclusion means results can wander far from broad value benchmarks in either direction, and the fund has only traded since 2023.euclideanetf.com
  • SEIV About 80 stocks measured against a 500-name benchmark. That concentration means stretches where it looks nothing like the S&P 500, in either direction.
  • Launched in 2022, so the live record is short, and the asset base is mid-sized rather than among the giants of the value aisle.
  • You get the factor recipe, not the trade-by-trade logic: selection sits inside a quantitative model. Distributions land quarterly, not monthly.

Full ECML profile⁠

Full SEIV profile⁠

ECML vs SEIV Holdings

How ECML and SEIV differ

Overlap by weight

10.7%

Shared holdings make up 22.2% of ECML and 10.7% of SEIV.

Level by level

  • Holdings14 in both10.7%
  • Sector11 Sectors44.2%
  • Countryby domicile98.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ECML and SEIV, widest gap first
SectorMore in ECMLMore in SEIV
TechnologySEIV +25.6 points
EnergyECML +18.7 points
FinancialsSEIV +15.9 points
MaterialsECML +12.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryECML +9.2 points
Consumer StaplesECML +8.4 points
CommunicationSEIV +7.9 points
UtilitiesSEIV +6.1 points
Health CareECML +3.8 points
IndustrialsECML +3.3 points
Real EstateSEIV +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ECML and SEIV, widest gap first
CountryMore in ECMLMore in SEIV
SwitzerlandECML +1.4 points
MexicoSEIV +1.1 points
Other countries (2)SEIV +0.3 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ECML22.2%
  • SEIV25.1%

Securities held

  • ECML64
  • SEIV122

Asset class

ECML
Equity
SEIV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ECML50
  • In both14
  • Only in SEIV108

Only in ECML

50 securities, 77.8% of ECML by weight

  • EPAM Systems Inc2.78%
  • Crocs Inc2.68%
  • Altria Group Inc2.17%

Only in SEIV

108 securities, 88.8% of SEIV by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp3.58%
  • Apple Inc3.54%
  • General Motors Co2.53%

Weight gaps

All 14 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ECML and SEIV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ECMLMore in SEIV
H&R Block IncHRBECML +1.80 points
HF Sinclair CorpDINOECML +1.76 points
Fox CorpFOXAECML +1.32 points
Newmont CorpNEMECML +1.09 points
APA CorpAPAECML +0.94 points
BorgWarner IncBWAECML +0.89 points
Crown Holdings IncCCKECML +0.86 points
Ingredion IncINGRECML +0.85 points

All ECML holdings⁠All 122 SEIV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ECML vs SEIV Cost

Overpaying ECML vs SEIV

$14,732

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ECML 0.95%

    $17,869

  • SEIV 0.15%

    $3,137

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ECML 0.95%
  • SEIV 0.15%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ECML $17,869SEIV $3,137

Year by year

YearECMLSEIVOverpaying
10$1,678$274$1,404
20$6,322$1,071$5,251
30$17,869$3,137$14,732

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%ECML
  • 0.15%SEIV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Value funds
  • Median 0.54%

SEIV 2nd cheapest of 64 funds

ECML 62nd cheapest of 64 funds

ECML vs SEIV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ECML 1.14%
SEIV 1.57%, better
Payout (12M)
ECML $0.46
SEIV $0.78
Last payment
ECML $0.46
SEIV $0.21
Ex-dividend
ECML Dec 23, 2025
SEIV Oct 5, 2026
Paid on
ECML Dec 24, 2025
SEIV Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
ECML Annual
SEIV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

ECMLAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ECML payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2023 $0.24; Dec 30, 2024 $0.31; Dec 23, 2025 $0.46. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
SEIVQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll SEIV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jul 5, 2022 $0.07; Oct 4, 2022 $0.14; Dec 27, 2022 $0.17; Apr 3, 2023 $0.16; Jul 3, 2023 $0.14; Oct 3, 2023 $0.13; Dec 26, 2023 $0.15; Apr 3, 2024 $0.10; Jul 8, 2024 $0.17; Oct 4, 2024 $0.15; Dec 27, 2024 $0.14; Apr 3, 2025 $0.16; Jul 7, 2025 $0.15; Oct 3, 2025 $0.13; Dec 29, 2025 $0.18; Apr 6, 2026 $0.19; Jul 6, 2026 $0.20; Oct 5, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ECML vs SEIV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ECML 17.6%SEIV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ECML 0.70SEIV 1.80, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ECML −24.7%since May 2023SEIV −18.2%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ECML 0.76SEIV 0.89

ECML and SEIV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ECMLDvsAVLVA

    Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsAVLVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ECMLDvsWTVA

    Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsWTVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ECMLDvsDFLVA

    Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsDFLVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.