DFLV ranks 4th and GMOV 17th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs GMOV
DFLV −0.29pt a year
0.21%0.50%
DFLV 45.3×the volume
658K14.5K
DFLV vs GMOV Performance
+29.3%+29.5%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- GMOV 0.50%
- DFLV $7.39B
- GMOV $101M
- DFLV +29.3%
- GMOV +29.5%, better
- DFLV 1.35%
- GMOV 1.83%, better
- DFLV 336
- GMOV 167
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- GMOV 14.5K sh
- DFLV $41.80
- GMOV $33.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | GMOV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | B57 |
| Mission | B57 | |
| Risk | A76 | A87Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A83Higher | C53 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and GMOV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
GMOVB
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
GMOV GMO's quant value playbook in an ETF wrapper: proprietary models and relative valuation analysis picking US stocks, priced below the typical active value fund. Launched in late 2024, so the live record is still short.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
GMOV The Fund seeks total return through an actively managed strategy focused primarily on U.S. equities. GMO applies proprietary quantitative methods and relative valuation analysis to select securities it believes have attractive return potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs GMOV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs GMOV Cost
Overpaying GMOV vs DFLV
$5,622
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
GMOV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | GMOV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $900 | $517 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $3,460 | $1,969 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $9,979 | $5,622 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.50%GMOV
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
GMOV 26th cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs GMOV Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%
- GMOV 1.83%, better
- DFLV $0.57
- GMOV $0.61
- DFLV $0.16
- GMOV $0.17
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- GMOV Sep 30, 2026
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- GMOV Oct 1, 2026
- DFLV Quarterly
- GMOV Quarterly
Distribution history
DFLV vs GMOV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%GMOV 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38GMOV 1.10
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%GMOV −16.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80GMOV 0.65
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.