DFLV ranks 4th and LCF 45th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs LCF
DFLV −0.35pt a year
0.21%0.56%
DFLV 804.4×the volume
658K818
DFLV +3.6pt
+21.8%+18.2%
DFLV vs LCF Performance
+29.6%+7.3%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- LCF 0.56%
- DFLV $7.39B
- LCF $70M
- DFLV +29.6%, better
- LCF +7.3%
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- LCF 0.51%
- DFLV 336
- LCF 46
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- LCF 818 sh
- DFLV $41.86
- LCF $44.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | LCF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | C42 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A83Higher | C41 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and LCF are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
LCFD
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
LCF A 25-to-45-stock book built on one idea: durable moats trading below their intrinsic value. Fort Washington runs it, non-diversified by design, at 0.56% net of a waiver through April 29, 2027.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
LCF The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of U.S. companies selected for attractive intrinsic value and durable competitive advantages.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs LCF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs LCF Cost
Overpaying LCF vs DFLV
$6,731
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
LCF 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | LCF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $1,006 | $623 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $3,855 | $2,364 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $11,088 | $6,731 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.56%LCF
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
LCF 38th cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs LCF Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- LCF 0.51%
- DFLV $0.57
- LCF $0.23
- DFLV $0.16
- LCF $0.23
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- LCF Dec 30, 2025
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- LCF Dec 31, 2025
- DFLV Quarterly
- LCF Annual
Distribution history
DFLV vs LCF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%, betterLCF 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38, betterLCF 1.11
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%LCF −18.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80LCF 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.