WTV ranks 1st and LCF 47th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
LCF vs WTV
WTV −0.44pt a year
0.56%0.12%
WTV 204.7×the volume
818167K
WTV +5.1pt
+19.0%+24.1%
LCF vs WTV Performance
+7.2%+20.9%
- LCF 0.56%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- LCF $70M
- WTV $3.33B
- LCF +7.2%
- WTV +20.9%, better
- LCF 0.51%
- WTV 2.00%, better
- LCF 46
- WTV 126
- LCF 818 sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- LCF $44.88
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LCF | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | D36 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. LCF and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LCFD
WTVA
In short
LCF A 25-to-45-stock book built on one idea: durable moats trading below their intrinsic value. Fort Washington runs it, non-diversified by design, at 0.56% net of a waiver through April 29, 2027.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
LCF The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of U.S. companies selected for attractive intrinsic value and durable competitive advantages.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LCF vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LCF vs WTV Cost
Overpaying LCF vs WTV
$8,568
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LCF 0.56%
$11,088
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LCF | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,006 | $220 | $786 |
| 20 | $3,855 | $859 | $2,996 |
| 30 | $11,088 | $2,520 | $8,568 |
- 0.56%LCF
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
LCF 39th cheapest of 64 funds
LCF vs WTV Dividends
- LCF 0.51%
- WTV 2.00%, better
- LCF $0.23
- WTV $2.14
- LCF $0.23
- WTV $0.55
- LCF Dec 30, 2025
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- LCF Dec 31, 2025
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- LCF Annual
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
LCF vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LCF 12.5%, betterWTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- LCF 1.11WTV 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- LCF −18.3%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- LCF 0.95WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.56% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.