SIXJ ranks 4th and DHDG 49th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
DHDG vs SIXJ
0.0%by weight
SIXJ −0.11pt a year
0.85%0.74%
DHDG 2.0×the volume
30.2K15.1K
DHDG vs SIXJ Performance
+11.8%+10.5%
- DHDG 0.85%
- SIXJ 0.74%, better
- DHDG $81M
- SIXJ $149M
- DHDG +11.8%, better
- SIXJ +10.5%
- DHDG 3
- SIXJ 3
- DHDG 30.2K sh, better
- SIXJ 15.1K sh
- DHDG $37.64
- SIXJ $37.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DHDG | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | B68Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A78Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | B65 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B59Higher | B57 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. DHDG and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DHDGC
SIXJB
In short
DHDG Most buffer ETFs lock in one cap for a full year. DHDG re-strikes every quarter against the S&P 500 ETF's price return, and it asks for a deductible: you take the first 2.5% of a drop, the fund absorbs the next 12.5 points.
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
Stated mandate
DHDG The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 4.30% upside cap, while buffering losses in the -2.5% to -15% range during the stated outcome period.
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DHDG vs SIXJ Holdings
How DHDG and SIXJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DHDG and 0.0% of SIXJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in DHDGMore in SIXJ | DHDG | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DHDGMore in SIXJ | DHDG | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- DHDG101.3%
- SIXJ100.8%
- DHDG2
- SIXJ2
Asset class
- DHDG
- Multi-Asset
- SIXJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DHDG2
- In both0
- Only in SIXJ2
Only in DHDG
2 securities, 100% of DHDG by weight
- 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.6398.11%
- 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 744.172.08%
Only in SIXJ
2 securities, 100% of SIXJ by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 5.53 C99.26%
- Spy 12/31/2026 746.70 P1.26%
Weight gaps
DHDG and SIXJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DHDG vs SIXJ Cost
Overpaying DHDG vs SIXJ
$1,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DHDG 0.85%
$16,199
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DHDG | SIXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,319 | $189 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,015 | $691 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,307 | $1,892 |
- 0.85%DHDG
- 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
DHDG 60th cheapest of 77 funds
DHDG vs SIXJ Dividends
- DHDG None
- SIXJ None
Distribution history
DHDG vs SIXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DHDG 6.4%SIXJ 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- DHDG 1.16SIXJ 1.67
- Worst fall
- DHDG −8.3%SIXJ −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DHDG 0.46SIXJ 0.46Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.