DIHP ranks 3rd and IQLT 4th of 6 funds in the International Quality Index Category.
DIHP vs IQLT
DIHP −0.03pt a year
0.27%0.30%
IQLT 2.4×the volume
614K1.47M
IQLT +1.2pt
+17.1%+18.3%
DIHP vs IQLT Performance
+13.2%+16.0%
- DIHP 0.27%, better
- IQLT 0.30%
- DIHP $6.58B
- IQLT $13.7B
- DIHP +13.2%
- IQLT +16.0%, better
- DIHP 2.04%
- IQLT 2.37%, better
- DIHP 552
- IQLT 308
- DIHP 614K sh
- IQLT 1.47M sh, better
- DIHP $34.11
- IQLT $50.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DIHP | IQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B64Higher | C44 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | B62 |
| Durability | B65 | A86Higher |
Rank among International Quality Index funds
Same Category. DIHP and IQLT are both graded against the same 6 International Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DIHPB
IQLTB
In short
DIHP Dimensional took its profitability screen overseas: roughly 500 large non-US companies, each judged against rivals in its own country or region, not one global yardstick. Fees land under the typical international factor fund.
IQLT Quality investing abroad, with the sector bets stripped out. IQLT holds developed-market companies picked for high return on equity, stable earnings and low debt, while keeping sector weights close to the broad market.
Stated mandate
DIHP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in large non-U.S. companies selected for relatively high profitability within their country or region.
IQLT The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks selected for high return on equity, stable earnings, and low debt.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DIHP vs IQLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DIHP vs IQLT Cost
Overpaying IQLT vs DIHP
$592
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DIHP 0.27%
$5,557
IQLT 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DIHP | IQLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $491 | $545 | $54 |
| 20 | $1,907 | $2,113 | $206 |
| 30 | $5,557 | $6,149 | $592 |
- 0.27%DIHP, cheaper
- 0.30%IQLT
- Middle half of International Quality Index funds
- Median 0.29%
DIHP 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
IQLT 4th cheapest of 6 funds
DIHP vs IQLT Dividends
- DIHP 2.04%
- IQLT 2.37%, better
- DIHP $0.69
- IQLT $1.20
- DIHP $0.16
- IQLT $0.75
- DIHP Sep 22, 2026
- IQLT Jun 15, 2026
- DIHP Sep 24, 2026
- IQLT Jun 18, 2026
- DIHP Quarterly
- IQLT Twice a year
Distribution history
DIHP vs IQLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DIHP 11.9%, betterIQLT 12.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- DIHP 1.02IQLT 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- DIHP −24.9%IQLT −29.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DIHP 0.84IQLT 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.27% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.