IQLT ranks 4th and FICS 5th of 6 funds in the International Quality Index Category.
FICS vs IQLT
IQLT −0.40pt a year
0.70%0.30%
IQLT 144.9×the volume
10.2K1.47M
IQLT +2.5pt
+5.1%+7.6%
FICS vs IQLT Performance
+28.1%+44.5%
- FICS 0.70%
- IQLT 0.30%, better
- FICS $205M
- IQLT $13.7B
- FICS +10.9%
- IQLT +16.0%, better
- FICS 1.87%
- IQLT 2.37%, better
- FICS 56
- IQLT 308
- FICS 10.2K sh
- IQLT 1.47M sh, better
- FICS $41.74
- IQLT $50.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FICS | IQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | C44Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B56Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | C45 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | C42 | B62Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A86Higher |
Rank among International Quality Index funds
Same Category. FICS and IQLT are both graded against the same 6 International Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FICSC
IQLTB
In short
FICS A balance-sheet screen shipped overseas. FICS holds roughly 60 developed-market names filtered for financial strength and lower volatility, and charges 0.70% for the sorting work.
IQLT Quality investing abroad, with the sector bets stripped out. IQLT holds developed-market companies picked for high return on equity, stable earnings and low debt, while keeping sector weights close to the broad market.
Stated mandate
FICS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of The International Developed Capital StrengthTM Index. Normally, it invests at least 90% of net assets in the index’s common stocks and REITs.
IQLT The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks selected for high return on equity, stable earnings, and low debt.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FICS vs IQLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FICS vs IQLT Cost
Overpaying FICS vs IQLT
$7,457
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FICS 0.70%
$13,606
IQLT 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FICS | IQLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $545 | $705 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $2,113 | $2,647 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $6,149 | $7,457 |
- 0.70%FICS
- 0.30%IQLT, cheaper
- Middle half of International Quality Index funds
- Median 0.29%
IQLT 4th cheapest of 6 funds
FICS 6th cheapest of 6 funds
FICS vs IQLT Dividends
- FICS 1.87%
- IQLT 2.37%, better
- FICS $0.78
- IQLT $1.20
- FICS $0.10
- IQLT $0.75
- FICS Sep 24, 2026
- IQLT Jun 15, 2026
- FICS Sep 30, 2026
- IQLT Jun 18, 2026
- FICS Quarterly
- IQLT Twice a year
Distribution history
FICS vs IQLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FICS
- IQLT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FICS 12.3%IQLT 12.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FICS 0.80IQLT 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- FICS −29.2%, betterIQLT −29.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FICS 0.71IQLT 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.