Skip to content

FICS vs IQLT

First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF

FICSCNasdaq

iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF

IQLTBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IQLT −0.40pt a year

FICS0.70%IQLT0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

IQLT 144.9×the volume

FICS10.2KIQLT1.47M

5Y return · a year

IQLT +2.5pt

FICS+5.1%IQLT+7.6%

FICS vs IQLT Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+28.1%FICS+44.5%IQLT

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FICS +28.1%. IQLT +44.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FICS 0.70%
IQLT 0.30%, better
Fund size
FICS $205M
IQLT $13.7B
1Y total return
FICS +10.9%
IQLT +16.0%, better
Yield (12M)
FICS 1.87%
IQLT 2.37%, better
Holdings
FICS 56
IQLT 308
Avg volume (30D)
FICS 10.2K sh
IQLT 1.47M sh, better
NAV per share
FICS $41.74
IQLT $50.38
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FICS: Cost 10, Risk 56, Mission 85, Tradability 45, Holdings 42, Durability 41. IQLT: Cost 44, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 85, Holdings 62, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for FICS, IQLT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFICSIQLT
Cost30% weightF10C44Higher
Mission25% weightA85Not scored
Risk15% weightB56HigherC52
Tradability15% weightC45A85Higher
Holdings10% weightC42B62Higher
Durability5% weightC41A86Higher

Rank among International Quality Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FICS and IQLT are both graded against the same 6 International Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 6 ›

IQLT ranks 4th and FICS 5th of 6 funds in the International Quality Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLVDNorthern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 71
  2. Rank 2BIDHQInvesco S&P International Developed Quality ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BDIHPDimensional International High Profitability ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4BIQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 5CFICSFirst Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 6DEAFGPacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FICSCFirst Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF

IQLTBiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF

In short

FICS A balance-sheet screen shipped overseas. FICS holds roughly 60 developed-market names filtered for financial strength and lower volatility, and charges 0.70% for the sorting work.

IQLT Quality investing abroad, with the sector bets stripped out. IQLT holds developed-market companies picked for high return on equity, stable earnings and low debt, while keeping sector weights close to the broad market.

Stated mandate

FICS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of The International Developed Capital StrengthTM Index. Normally, it invests at least 90% of net assets in the index’s common stocks and REITs.

IQLT The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks selected for high return on equity, stable earnings, and low debt.

Why people hold it

  • FICS Rules-based quality and low-volatility screen on developed international stocks, with at least 90% of net assets in the index's own common stocks and REITs.ftportfolios.com
  • Roughly 60 holdings, so the screen actually shows up in the portfolio instead of getting diluted into a market-cap blob.
  • Pure non-US developed exposure with no home-market overlap, and cash comes back on a quarterly schedule.
  • Running since its 2020 launch, tracking a named, published index rather than a manager's discretion.
  • IQLT The screen is refreshingly plain: high return on equity, stable earnings, low debt, spread across roughly 300 developed-market companies outside the US.ishares.com
  • Sector neutral by design. The quality tilt shows up in which companies it owns, not as a quiet overweight to whatever sector screens well that year.ishares.com
  • 0.30% a year, below the typical international factor fund, and it has been running since 2015.
  • A multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, which puts it among the more established ways to own the quality factor overseas.

Worth knowing

  • FICS The 0.70% expense ratio sits above what plain index trackers in its cohort typically charge. That is the price of the screen.
  • One of the thinner traders in its category, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the standard defense.
  • About 60 stocks with a quality and low-vol tilt means returns can diverge meaningfully from broad developed-market indexes in either direction.
  • IQLT Developed markets outside the US only. No American stocks, no emerging markets, so it fills one slot rather than covering the whole map.
  • A quality screen narrows the field to profitable, low-debt names, so results can diverge from the broad international market in either direction.
  • Cheaper factor options sit in the same aisle (QLVD, EFAV, ACWV), though each runs a different screen rather than sector-neutral quality.

Full FICS profile⁠

Full IQLT profile⁠

FICS vs IQLT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FICS vs IQLT Cost

Overpaying FICS vs IQLT

$7,457

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FICS 0.70%

    $13,606

  • IQLT 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FICS 0.70%
  • IQLT 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FICS $13,606IQLT $6,149

Year by year

YearFICSIQLTOverpaying
10$1,250$545$705
20$4,760$2,113$2,647
30$13,606$6,149$7,457

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%FICS
  • 0.30%IQLT, cheaper
  • Middle half of International Quality Index funds
  • Median 0.29%

IQLT 4th cheapest of 6 funds

FICS 6th cheapest of 6 funds

FICS vs IQLT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FICS 1.87%
IQLT 2.37%, better
Payout (12M)
FICS $0.78
IQLT $1.20
Last payment
FICS $0.10
IQLT $0.75
Ex-dividend
FICS Sep 24, 2026
IQLT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
FICS Sep 30, 2026
IQLT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
FICS Quarterly
IQLT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FICSQuarterly · 23 paymentsAll FICS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 25, 2021 $0.05; Jun 24, 2021 $0.25; Sep 23, 2021 $0.04; Dec 23, 2021 $0.13; Mar 25, 2022 $0.06; Jun 24, 2022 $0.29; Sep 23, 2022 $0.11; Dec 23, 2022 $0.08; Mar 24, 2023 $0.05; Jun 27, 2023 $0.17; Sep 22, 2023 $0.05; Dec 22, 2023 $0.06; Mar 21, 2024 $0.05; Jun 27, 2024 $0.34; Sep 26, 2024 $0.10; Dec 13, 2024 $0.19; Mar 27, 2025 $0.15; Jun 26, 2025 $0.47; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Dec 12, 2025 $0.03; Mar 26, 2026 $0.19; Jun 25, 2026 $0.45; Sep 24, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
IQLTTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll IQLT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.53; Dec 19, 2017 $0.17; Jun 19, 2018 $0.50; Dec 18, 2018 $0.20; Jun 17, 2019 $0.47; Dec 16, 2019 $0.27; Jun 15, 2020 $0.34; Dec 14, 2020 $0.23; Jun 10, 2021 $0.48; Dec 13, 2021 $0.40; Jun 9, 2022 $0.71; Dec 13, 2022 $0.30; Jun 7, 2023 $0.48; Dec 20, 2023 $0.37; Jun 11, 2024 $0.63; Dec 17, 2024 $0.44; Jun 16, 2025 $0.61; Dec 16, 2025 $0.45; Jun 15, 2026 $0.75. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FICS vs IQLT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FICS
  • IQLT
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: IQLT −29.7% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FICS 12.3%IQLT 12.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FICS 0.80IQLT 1.08, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FICS −29.2%, betterIQLT −29.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FICS 0.71IQLT 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • FICSCvsQLVDA

    First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF · Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IQLTBvsQLVDA

    iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF · Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FICSCvsIDHQB

    First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF · Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IQLTBvsIDHQB

    iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF · Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FICSCvsDIHPB

    First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF · Dimensional International High Profitability ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.27%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IQLTBvsDIHPB

    iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF · Dimensional International High Profitability ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.27%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.