DIVB ranks 3rd and FTDS 46th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DIVB vs FTDS
10.3%by weight
DIVB −0.65pt a year
0.05%0.70%
DIVB 136.6×the volume
298K2.19K
DIVB +6.2pt
+14.5%+8.3%
DIVB vs FTDS Performance
+96.4%+48.9%
- DIVB 0.05%, better
- FTDS 0.70%
- DIVB $2.31B
- FTDS $40M
- DIVB +40.7%, better
- FTDS +26.8%
- DIVB 2.08%, better
- FTDS 1.57%
- DIVB 384
- FTDS 51
- DIVB 298K sh, better
- FTDS 2.19K sh
- DIVB $71.28
- FTDS $67.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DIVB | FTDS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A86Higher | A83 |
| Risk | A74Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | B60 | B61Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | C54 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DIVB and FTDS are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DIVBA
FTDSC
In short
DIVB Most dividend funds only count the check that hits your account. DIVB's index also counts buybacks, treating a shrinking share count as cash returned to owners, and it charges five basis points to do it.
FTDS A yield fund with a bouncer at the door: companies must clear debt, return-on-equity, payout and dividend-growth tests before the index ranks them by yield. The roughly 50 survivors get equal weight, rechecked every quarter.
Stated mandate
DIVB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies selected for a history of dividend payments and/or share buybacks, providing equity exposure oriented toward income and long-term growth.
FTDS The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of The Dividend Strength Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DIVB vs FTDS Holdings
How DIVB and FTDS differ
10.3%
Shared holdings make up 73.7% of FTDS and 11.3% of DIVB.
Level by level
- Holdings10.3%
- Country99.4%
Sector
No Sector split for DIVB.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DIVBMore in FTDS | DIVB | FTDS |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FTDS +0.6 points | 99.4% | 100.0% |
| Other countries (4) | DIVB +0.6 points | 0.6% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- DIVB32.7%
- FTDS21.1%
- DIVB381
- FTDS50
Asset class
- DIVB
- Equity
- FTDS
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DIVB344
- In both37
- Only in FTDS13
Only in DIVB
344 securities, 88.4% of DIVB by weight
- Accenture PLC Class A6.53%
- International Business Machines Co5.18%
- Automatic Data Processing Inc4.98%
- Exxonmobil Holdings Corp2.75%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co2.36%
- Paychex2.06%
- Johnson & Johnson2.03%
- AbbVie1.94%
- Chevron1.90%
- Hp Inc1.88%
- Procter & Gamble1.69%
- UnitedHealth Group1.46%
- Leidos Holdings1.44%
- Pfizer1.39%
- Ss and C Technologies Holdings1.37%
- Merck & Co Inc1.34%
- Skyworks Solutions1.31%
- Philip Morris International1.25%
- Microchip Technology Inc1.22%
- Bank of America1.12%
- Altria Group Inc1.11%
- Coca-Cola1.08%
- Wells Fargo1.05%
- Verizon Communications Inc1.01%
- Pepsico0.99%
- Hca Healthcare0.97%
- AT&T0.80%
- Gilead Sciences0.78%
- Citigroup0.78%
- Progressive0.77%
- Home Depot0.76%
- Amgen Inc0.76%
- Gen Digital0.72%
- Comcast Class A0.69%
- Abbott Laboratories0.66%
- Marathon Petroleum0.64%
- Bristol Myers Squibb0.63%
- T Mobile Us Inc0.59%
- Cigna0.59%
- Mcdonalds Corp0.52%
- Medtronic PLC0.52%
- Morgan Stanley0.51%
- Capital One Financial Corp0.50%
- Mondelez International Class A0.44%
- Genpact0.43%
- Truist Financial0.43%
- Cme Group Class A0.43%
- United Parcel Service Inc Class B0.42%
- Cvs Health0.42%
- Valero Energy Corp0.41%
Only in FTDS
13 securities, 26.2% of FTDS by weight
- Equifax Inc.2.22%
- NXP Semiconductors N.V.2.19%
- Texas Roadhouse, Inc.2.10%
- Northrop Grumman Corporation2.08%
- Targa Resources Corp.2.07%
- Houlihan Lokey, Inc.2.06%
- Intuit Inc.2.03%
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation1.99%
- Zoetis Inc.1.95%
- Baker Hughes Company (Class A)1.92%
- W.R. Berkley Corporation1.90%
- QUALCOMM Incorporated1.86%
- Cummins Inc.1.82%
Weight gaps
All 37 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in DIVBMore in FTDS | DIVB | FTDS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oshkosh Corp | FTDS +2.10 points | 0.03% | 2.13% |
| Toro | FTDS +2.03 points | 0.05% | 2.08% |
| Apa | FTDS +2.02 points | 0.06% | 2.08% |
| Halliburton | FTDS +1.98 points | 0.11% | 2.09% |
| Cincinnati Financial | FTDS +1.97 points | 0.08% | 2.05% |
| Everest Group | FTDS +1.97 points | 0.08% | 2.05% |
| Rpm International Inc | FTDS +1.96 points | 0.03% | 1.99% |
| Southstate Bank Corp | FTDS +1.96 points | 0.04% | 2.00% |
| East West Bancorp | FTDS +1.95 points | 0.05% | 2.00% |
| Avery Dennison Corp | FTDS +1.94 points | 0.07% | 2.01% |
| Cullen Frost Bankers | FTDS +1.94 points | 0.03% | 1.97% |
| Mccormick & Co Non-Voting | FTDS +1.92 points | 0.06% | 1.98% |
| Tractor Supply | FTDS +1.91 points | 0.07% | 1.98% |
| Chord Energy | FTDS +1.90 points | 0.07% | 1.97% |
| General Dynamics Corp | FTDS +1.90 points | 0.20% | 2.10% |
| Commerce Bancshares | FTDS +1.89 points | 0.03% | 1.92% |
| Regions Financial | FTDS +1.89 points | 0.13% | 2.02% |
| Ingredion Inc | FTDS +1.88 points | 0.04% | 1.92% |
| Cf Industries Holdings Inc | FTDS +1.87 points | 0.11% | 1.98% |
| Popular | FTDS +1.86 points | 0.05% | 1.91% |
| Principal Financial Group Inc | FTDS +1.86 points | 0.13% | 1.99% |
| Snap On Inc | FTDS +1.82 points | 0.06% | 1.88% |
| Expand Energy | FTDS +1.81 points | 0.07% | 1.88% |
| Devon Energy | FTDS +1.80 points | 0.19% | 1.99% |
| Marsh | FTDS +1.76 points | 0.31% | 2.07% |
| Hartford Insurance Group | FTDS +1.71 points | 0.19% | 1.90% |
| Aflac | FTDS +1.64 points | 0.36% | 2.00% |
| Target Corp | FTDS +1.64 points | 0.30% | 1.94% |
| Union Pacific | FTDS +1.61 points | 0.43% | 2.04% |
| Jack Henry and Associates Inc | FTDS +1.55 points | 0.49% | 2.04% |
| Phillips 66 | FTDS +1.54 points | 0.33% | 1.87% |
| Eog Resources | FTDS +1.53 points | 0.50% | 2.03% |
| Conocophillips | FTDS +1.37 points | 0.67% | 2.04% |
| Elevance Health Inc | FTDS +1.32 points | 0.58% | 1.90% |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Cla | DIVB +1.06 points | 2.97% | 1.91% |
| Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc | FTDS +0.92 points | 1.06% | 1.98% |
| Cdw | FTDS +0.67 points | 1.31% | 1.98% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DIVB vs FTDS Cost
Overpaying FTDS vs DIVB
$12,546
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DIVB 0.05%
$1,060
FTDS 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DIVB | FTDS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $1,250 | $1,158 |
| 20 | $360 | $4,760 | $4,400 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $13,606 | $12,546 |
- 0.05%DIVB, cheaper
- 0.70%FTDS
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DIVB 2nd cheapest of 52 funds
FTDS 52nd cheapest of 52 funds
DIVB vs FTDS Dividends
- DIVB 2.08%, better
- FTDS 1.57%
- DIVB $1.48
- FTDS $1.06
- DIVB $0.42
- FTDS $0.31
- DIVB Sep 15, 2026
- FTDS Sep 24, 2026
- DIVB Sep 18, 2026
- FTDS Sep 30, 2026
- DIVB Quarterly
- FTDS Quarterly
Distribution history
DIVB vs FTDS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DIVB
- FTDS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DIVB 14.0%, betterFTDS 14.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DIVB 1.58, betterFTDS 1.08
- Worst fall
- DIVB −21.1%, betterFTDS −23.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DIVB 0.88FTDS 0.59
DIVB and FTDS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
