DGRO ranks 1st and FTDS 46th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DGRO vs FTDS
DGRO −0.62pt a year
0.08%0.70%
DGRO 634.3×the volume
1.39M2.19K
DGRO +2.2pt
+14.1%+11.9%
DGRO vs FTDS Performance
+71.0%+48.9%
- DGRO 0.08%, better
- FTDS 0.70%
- DGRO $45.3B
- FTDS $40M
- DGRO +21.5%
- FTDS +26.8%, better
- DGRO 1.84%, better
- FTDS 1.57%
- DGRO 394
- FTDS 51
- DGRO 1.39M sh, better
- FTDS 2.19K sh
- DGRO $81.00
- FTDS $67.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DGRO | FTDS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A83 |
| Risk | A77Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | B62Higher | B61 |
| Durability | A87Higher | C54 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DGRO and FTDS are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DGROA
FTDSC
In short
DGRO BlackRock's dividend-growth screen casts a wider net than most: five straight years of raises rather than ten, plus a payout-ratio cap that filters out stretched payers. About 400 US dividend raisers, large through small cap, for 0.08% a year.
FTDS A yield fund with a bouncer at the door: companies must clear debt, return-on-equity, payout and dividend-growth tests before the index ranks them by yield. The roughly 50 survivors get equal weight, rechecked every quarter.
Stated mandate
DGRO The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. equities whose dividends have grown consistently.
FTDS The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of The Dividend Strength Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DGRO vs FTDS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DGRO vs FTDS Cost
Overpaying FTDS vs DGRO
$11,917
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DGRO 0.08%
$1,689
FTDS 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DGRO | FTDS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $1,250 | $1,103 |
| 20 | $575 | $4,760 | $4,185 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $13,606 | $11,917 |
- 0.08%DGRO, cheaper
- 0.70%FTDS
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DGRO 8th cheapest of 52 funds
FTDS 52nd cheapest of 52 funds
DGRO vs FTDS Dividends
- DGRO 1.84%, better
- FTDS 1.57%
- DGRO $1.49
- FTDS $1.06
- DGRO $0.39
- FTDS $0.31
- DGRO Sep 15, 2026
- FTDS Sep 24, 2026
- DGRO Sep 18, 2026
- FTDS Sep 30, 2026
- DGRO Quarterly
- FTDS Quarterly
Distribution history
DGRO vs FTDS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DGRO
- FTDS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DGRO 10.8%, betterFTDS 14.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DGRO 1.47, betterFTDS 1.08
- Worst fall
- DGRO −19.3%, betterFTDS −23.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DGRO 0.67FTDS 0.59
DGRO and FTDS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





