SCHD ranks 2nd and FTDS 46th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
FTDS vs SCHD
SCHD −0.64pt a year
0.70%0.06%
SCHD 10341.4×the volume
2.19K22.6M
SCHD +1.8pt
+11.9%+13.7%
FTDS vs SCHD Performance
+48.9%+65.6%
- FTDS 0.70%
- SCHD 0.06%, better
- FTDS $40M
- SCHD $121B
- FTDS +26.8%
- SCHD +38.4%, better
- FTDS 1.57%
- SCHD 2.95%, better
- FTDS 51
- SCHD 100
- FTDS 2.19K sh
- SCHD 22.6M sh, better
- FTDS $67.47
- SCHD $35.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTDS | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A84Higher |
| Risk | C46 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | D32 |
| Durability | C54 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. FTDS and SCHD are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTDSC
SCHDA
In short
FTDS A yield fund with a bouncer at the door: companies must clear debt, return-on-equity, payout and dividend-growth tests before the index ranks them by yield. The roughly 50 survivors get equal weight, rechecked every quarter.
SCHD The dividend fund that checks the balance sheet before it checks the yield. SCHD only considers companies with 10 straight years of payouts, then ranks the survivors on cash flow, return on equity and dividend growth. Quality gate first, income second, at six basis points.
Stated mandate
FTDS The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of The Dividend Strength Index before fees and expenses.
SCHD The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100TM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTDS vs SCHD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTDS vs SCHD Cost
Overpaying FTDS vs SCHD
$12,336
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTDS 0.70%
$13,606
SCHD 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTDS | SCHD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $110 | $1,140 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $432 | $4,328 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $1,270 | $12,336 |
- 0.70%FTDS
- 0.06%SCHD, cheaper
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
SCHD 4th cheapest of 52 funds
FTDS 52nd cheapest of 52 funds
FTDS vs SCHD Dividends
- FTDS 1.57%
- SCHD 2.95%, better
- FTDS $1.06
- SCHD $1.05
- FTDS $0.31
- SCHD $0.27
- FTDS Sep 24, 2026
- SCHD Sep 23, 2026
- FTDS Sep 30, 2026
- SCHD Sep 28, 2026
- FTDS Quarterly
- SCHD Quarterly
Distribution history
FTDS vs SCHD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTDS
- SCHD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTDS 14.3%SCHD 14.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FTDS 1.08SCHD 1.08Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- FTDS −23.4%SCHD −16.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTDS 0.59SCHD 0.58
FTDS and SCHD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





