Skip to content

FTDS vs SCHD

First Trust Dividend Strength ETF

FTDSCNasdaq

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

SCHDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHD −0.64pt a year

FTDS0.70%SCHD0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHD 10341.4×the volume

FTDS2.19KSCHD22.6M

10Y return · a year

SCHD +1.8pt

FTDS+11.9%SCHD+13.7%

FTDS vs SCHD Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+48.9%FTDS+65.6%SCHD

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FTDS +48.9%. SCHD +65.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FTDS 0.70%
SCHD 0.06%, better
Fund size
FTDS $40M
SCHD $121B
1Y total return
FTDS +26.8%
SCHD +38.4%, better
Yield (12M)
FTDS 1.57%
SCHD 2.95%, better
Holdings
FTDS 51
SCHD 100
Avg volume (30D)
FTDS 2.19K sh
SCHD 22.6M sh, better
NAV per share
FTDS $67.47
SCHD $35.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTDS: Cost 0, Risk 46, Mission 83, Tradability 27, Holdings 61, Durability 54. SCHD: Cost 95, Risk 71, Mission 84, Tradability 91, Holdings 32, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTDS, SCHD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTDSSCHD
Cost30% weightF0A95Higher
Mission25% weightA83A84Higher
Risk15% weightC46A71Higher
Tradability15% weightD27A91Higher
Holdings10% weightB61HigherD32
Durability5% weightC54A83Higher

Rank among US Dividend Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FTDS and SCHD are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Dividend Index⁠

Category · 52 funds
See all 52 ›

SCHD ranks 2nd and FTDS 46th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ADGROiShares Core Dividend Growth ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASCHDSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3ADIVBiShares Core Dividend ETFScore 80
  4. Rank 45CPEYInvesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 46CFTDSFirst Trust Dividend Strength ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 46CTMDVProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTDSCFirst Trust Dividend Strength ETF

SCHDASchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

In short

FTDS A yield fund with a bouncer at the door: companies must clear debt, return-on-equity, payout and dividend-growth tests before the index ranks them by yield. The roughly 50 survivors get equal weight, rechecked every quarter.

SCHD The dividend fund that checks the balance sheet before it checks the yield. SCHD only considers companies with 10 straight years of payouts, then ranks the survivors on cash flow, return on equity and dividend growth. Quality gate first, income second, at six basis points.

Stated mandate

FTDS The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of The Dividend Strength Index before fees and expenses.

SCHD The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100TM Index.

Why people hold it

  • FTDS Balance sheet first: long-term debt under 40% of market cap, ROE above 10%, payout under 50%, five-year dividend growth above 5%. Yield ranking comes after those gates.nasdaqomx.comftportfolios.com
  • Equal weight across roughly 50 names, rebuilt quarterly, so no single mega-cap sets the tone.ftportfolios.com
  • Rules-based and passive: a Nasdaq-maintained index drawn from the Nasdaq US Benchmark, with liquidity screens. No manager picking favorites. Pays quarterly.nasdaqomx.com
  • SCHD Charges 0.06% a year, near the floor for US equity ETFs and a fraction of what the typical dividend-screen fund costs.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • The rulebook is strict: 10 consecutive years of dividends to qualify, then a composite rank on cash-flow-to-total-debt, return on equity, yield and five-year dividend growth.spglobal.com
  • Index rules cap any single stock at 4.5% and any sector at 25%, so one hot name cannot quietly become the whole income stream.spglobal.com
  • Running since 2011 and now among the largest, most heavily traded dividend ETFs, with tracking that stays very close to its index.

Worth knowing

  • FTDS 0.70% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027 (0.81% gross), above the category median. Big index rivals cost far less: SCHD 0.06%, VIG 0.04%.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so the bid/ask spread is part of the cost of getting in and out.
  • The ticker dates to 2006, the strategy does not: it tracked Value Line, then AlphaDEX indexes, before switching to The Dividend Strength Index in April 2022.sec.gov
  • SCHD Roughly 100 names, every one a long-time dividend payer. The fast-growing non-payers that drive much of the US market are not eligible, by design.spglobal.com
  • The yield and quality screens tilt it toward mature, cash-generating sectors, so it looks nothing like a total-market fund. Distributions land quarterly, not monthly.spglobal.com
  • Not the absolute cheapest shelf item: VIG runs 0.04% and DIVB 0.05%, though both screen for dividends differently.

Full FTDS profile⁠

Full SCHD profile⁠

FTDS vs SCHD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTDS vs SCHD Cost

Overpaying FTDS vs SCHD

$12,336

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTDS 0.70%

    $13,606

  • SCHD 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTDS 0.70%
  • SCHD 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FTDS $13,606SCHD $1,270

Year by year

YearFTDSSCHDOverpaying
10$1,250$110$1,140
20$4,760$432$4,328
30$13,606$1,270$12,336

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%FTDS
  • 0.06%SCHD, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
  • Median 0.35%

SCHD 4th cheapest of 52 funds

FTDS 52nd cheapest of 52 funds

FTDS vs SCHD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTDS 1.57%
SCHD 2.95%, better
Payout (12M)
FTDS $1.06
SCHD $1.05
Last payment
FTDS $0.31
SCHD $0.27
Ex-dividend
FTDS Sep 24, 2026
SCHD Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
FTDS Sep 30, 2026
SCHD Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
FTDS Quarterly
SCHD Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTDSQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FTDS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.08; Jun 22, 2017 $0.04; Sep 21, 2017 $0.05; Dec 21, 2017 $0.09; Mar 22, 2018 $0.06; Jun 21, 2018 $0.09; Sep 14, 2018 $0.06; Dec 18, 2018 $0.12; Mar 21, 2019 $0.08; Jun 14, 2019 $0.08; Sep 25, 2019 $0.13; Dec 13, 2019 $0.12; Mar 26, 2020 $0.10; Jun 25, 2020 $0.11; Sep 24, 2020 $0.08; Dec 24, 2020 $0.12; Mar 25, 2021 $0.08; Jun 24, 2021 $0.09; Sep 23, 2021 $0.10; Dec 23, 2021 $0.09; Mar 25, 2022 $0.14; Jun 24, 2022 $0.23; Sep 23, 2022 $0.23; Dec 23, 2022 $0.38; Mar 24, 2023 $0.22; Jun 27, 2023 $0.27; Sep 22, 2023 $0.14; Dec 22, 2023 $0.38; Mar 21, 2024 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.27; Sep 26, 2024 $0.23; Dec 13, 2024 $0.34; Mar 27, 2025 $0.22; Jun 26, 2025 $0.20; Sep 25, 2025 $0.23; Dec 12, 2025 $0.25; Mar 26, 2026 $0.31; Jun 25, 2026 $0.19; Sep 24, 2026 $0.31. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
SCHDQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SCHD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.11; Jun 19, 2017 $0.11; Sep 18, 2017 $0.10; Dec 18, 2017 $0.11; Mar 16, 2018 $0.09; Jun 26, 2018 $0.14; Sep 25, 2018 $0.12; Dec 12, 2018 $0.14; Mar 20, 2019 $0.12; Jun 26, 2019 $0.14; Sep 25, 2019 $0.16; Dec 12, 2019 $0.16; Mar 25, 2020 $0.15; Jun 24, 2020 $0.15; Sep 23, 2020 $0.18; Dec 10, 2020 $0.20; Mar 24, 2021 $0.17; Jun 23, 2021 $0.18; Sep 22, 2021 $0.20; Dec 8, 2021 $0.21; Mar 23, 2022 $0.17; Jun 22, 2022 $0.23; Sep 21, 2022 $0.21; Dec 7, 2022 $0.23; Mar 22, 2023 $0.20; Jun 21, 2023 $0.22; Sep 20, 2023 $0.22; Dec 6, 2023 $0.25; Mar 20, 2024 $0.20; Jun 26, 2024 $0.27; Sep 25, 2024 $0.25; Dec 11, 2024 $0.26; Mar 26, 2025 $0.25; Jun 25, 2025 $0.26; Sep 24, 2025 $0.26; Dec 10, 2025 $0.28; Mar 25, 2026 $0.26; Jun 24, 2026 $0.25; Sep 23, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FTDS vs SCHD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FTDS
  • SCHD
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FTDS −23.4% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTDS 14.3%SCHD 14.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTDS 1.08SCHD 1.08Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTDS −23.4%SCHD −16.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTDS 0.59SCHD 0.58

FTDS and SCHD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FTDSCvsDGROA

    First Trust Dividend Strength ETF · iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHDAvsDGROA

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF · iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTDSCvsDIVBA

    First Trust Dividend Strength ETF · iShares Core Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHDAvsDIVBA

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF · iShares Core Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTDSCvsSPYDA

    First Trust Dividend Strength ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHDAvsSPYDA

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.