DIVB ranks 3rd and PFM 30th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DIVB vs PFM
DIVB −0.47pt a year
0.05%0.52%
DIVB 16.0×the volume
298K18.7K
DIVB +3.8pt
+14.5%+10.7%
DIVB vs PFM Performance
+96.4%+66.5%
- DIVB 0.05%, better
- PFM 0.52%
- DIVB $2.31B
- PFM $815M
- DIVB +40.7%, better
- PFM +16.4%
- DIVB 2.08%, better
- PFM 1.29%
- DIVB 384
- PFM 431
- DIVB 298K sh, better
- PFM 18.7K sh
- DIVB $71.28
- PFM $58.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DIVB | PFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A86Higher | A84 |
| Risk | A74Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | B60Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A71Higher | B64 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DIVB and PFM are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DIVBA
PFMC
In short
DIVB Most dividend funds only count the check that hits your account. DIVB's index also counts buybacks, treating a shrinking share count as cash returned to owners, and it charges five basis points to do it.
PFM A 2005-vintage dividend fund that casts a wide net: roughly 400 US dividend payers from the Nasdaq Dividend Achievers family, held close to the index. The trade-off is price, in a corner of the market that has gotten very cheap.
Stated mandate
DIVB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies selected for a history of dividend payments and/or share buybacks, providing equity exposure oriented toward income and long-term growth.
PFM The Fund seeks to replicate the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index before fees and expenses and normally invests at least 90% of assets in dividend-paying common stocks in that Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DIVB vs PFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DIVB vs PFM Cost
Overpaying PFM vs DIVB
$9,291
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DIVB 0.05%
$1,060
PFM 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DIVB | PFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $935 | $843 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,593 | $3,233 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $10,351 | $9,291 |
- 0.05%DIVB, cheaper
- 0.52%PFM
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DIVB 2nd cheapest of 52 funds
PFM 43rd cheapest of 52 funds
DIVB vs PFM Dividends
- DIVB 2.08%, better
- PFM 1.29%
- DIVB $1.48
- PFM $0.75
- DIVB $0.42
- PFM $0.18
- DIVB Sep 15, 2026
- PFM Sep 21, 2026
- DIVB Sep 18, 2026
- PFM Sep 25, 2026
- DIVB Quarterly
- PFM Quarterly
Distribution history
DIVB vs PFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DIVB
- PFM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DIVB 14.0%PFM 10.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DIVB 1.58, betterPFM 1.33
- Worst fall
- DIVB −21.1%PFM −17.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DIVB 0.88PFM 0.78
DIVB and PFM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
