DGRO ranks 1st and PFM 30th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DGRO vs PFM
DGRO −0.44pt a year
0.08%0.52%
DGRO 74.3×the volume
1.39M18.7K
DGRO +1.8pt
+14.1%+12.3%
DGRO vs PFM Performance
+71.0%+66.5%
- DGRO 0.08%, better
- PFM 0.52%
- DGRO $45.3B
- PFM $815M
- DGRO +21.5%, better
- PFM +16.4%
- DGRO 1.84%, better
- PFM 1.29%
- DGRO 394
- PFM 431
- DGRO 1.39M sh, better
- PFM 18.7K sh
- DGRO $81.00
- PFM $58.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DGRO | PFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A84 |
| Risk | A77Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | B62Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A87Higher | B64 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DGRO and PFM are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DGROA
PFMC
In short
DGRO BlackRock's dividend-growth screen casts a wider net than most: five straight years of raises rather than ten, plus a payout-ratio cap that filters out stretched payers. About 400 US dividend raisers, large through small cap, for 0.08% a year.
PFM A 2005-vintage dividend fund that casts a wide net: roughly 400 US dividend payers from the Nasdaq Dividend Achievers family, held close to the index. The trade-off is price, in a corner of the market that has gotten very cheap.
Stated mandate
DGRO The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. equities whose dividends have grown consistently.
PFM The Fund seeks to replicate the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index before fees and expenses and normally invests at least 90% of assets in dividend-paying common stocks in that Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DGRO vs PFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DGRO vs PFM Cost
Overpaying PFM vs DGRO
$8,662
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DGRO 0.08%
$1,689
PFM 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DGRO | PFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $935 | $788 |
| 20 | $575 | $3,593 | $3,018 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $10,351 | $8,662 |
- 0.08%DGRO, cheaper
- 0.52%PFM
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DGRO 8th cheapest of 52 funds
PFM 43rd cheapest of 52 funds
DGRO vs PFM Dividends
- DGRO 1.84%, better
- PFM 1.29%
- DGRO $1.49
- PFM $0.75
- DGRO $0.39
- PFM $0.18
- DGRO Sep 15, 2026
- PFM Sep 21, 2026
- DGRO Sep 18, 2026
- PFM Sep 25, 2026
- DGRO Quarterly
- PFM Quarterly
Distribution history
DGRO vs PFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DGRO
- PFM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DGRO 10.8%PFM 10.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DGRO 1.47, betterPFM 1.33
- Worst fall
- DGRO −19.3%PFM −17.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DGRO 0.67PFM 0.78
DGRO and PFM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





