SPYD ranks 4th and PFM 30th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
PFM vs SPYD
SPYD −0.45pt a year
0.52%0.07%
SPYD 53.7×the volume
18.7K1M
PFM +3.4pt
+12.3%+8.9%
PFM vs SPYD Performance
+66.5%+52.1%
- PFM 0.52%
- SPYD 0.07%, better
- PFM $815M
- SPYD $7.61B
- PFM +16.4%
- SPYD +20.6%, better
- PFM 1.29%
- SPYD 4.20%, better
- PFM 431
- SPYD 81
- PFM 18.7K sh
- SPYD 1M sh, better
- PFM $58.41
- SPYD $48.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PFM | SPYD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A84 | A88Higher |
| Risk | B62Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | C50 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | A73Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. PFM and SPYD are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PFMC
SPYDA
In short
PFM A 2005-vintage dividend fund that casts a wide net: roughly 400 US dividend payers from the Nasdaq Dividend Achievers family, held close to the index. The trade-off is price, in a corner of the market that has gotten very cheap.
SPYD Most dividend ETFs hunt for companies that keep raising payouts. SPYD skips the courtship and goes straight for the yield: roughly 80 high-dividend names out of the S&P 500, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
PFM The Fund seeks to replicate the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index before fees and expenses and normally invests at least 90% of assets in dividend-paying common stocks in that Index.
SPYD The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return of the S&P 500 High Dividend Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PFM vs SPYD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PFM vs SPYD Cost
Overpaying PFM vs SPYD
$8,871
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PFM 0.52%
$10,351
SPYD 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PFM | SPYD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $935 | $128 | $807 |
| 20 | $3,593 | $503 | $3,090 |
| 30 | $10,351 | $1,480 | $8,871 |
- 0.52%PFM
- 0.07%SPYD, cheaper
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
SPYD 6th cheapest of 52 funds
PFM 43rd cheapest of 52 funds
PFM vs SPYD Dividends
- PFM 1.29%
- SPYD 4.20%, better
- PFM $0.75
- SPYD $2.06
- PFM $0.18
- SPYD $0.52
- PFM Sep 21, 2026
- SPYD Sep 21, 2026
- PFM Sep 25, 2026
- SPYD Sep 23, 2026
- PFM Quarterly
- SPYD Quarterly
Distribution history
PFM vs SPYD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PFM
- SPYD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PFM 10.5%, betterSPYD 14.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- PFM 1.33, betterSPYD 0.96
- Worst fall
- PFM −17.8%, betterSPYD −22.2%
- Market sensitivity
- PFM 0.78SPYD 0.64
PFM and SPYD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.52% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

