DIVB ranks 3rd and QDF 37th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DIVB vs QDF
DIVB −0.34pt a year
0.05%0.39%
DIVB 12.2×the volume
298K24.5K
DIVB +3.1pt
+14.5%+11.4%
DIVB vs QDF Performance
+96.4%+71.6%
- DIVB 0.05%, better
- QDF 0.39%
- DIVB $2.31B
- QDF $2.17B
- DIVB +40.7%, better
- QDF +14.5%
- DIVB 2.08%, better
- QDF 1.51%
- DIVB 384
- QDF 143
- DIVB 298K sh, better
- QDF 24.5K sh
- DIVB $71.28
- QDF $90.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DIVB | QDF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | D36 |
| Mission | A86Higher | B62 |
| Risk | A74Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B64 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | B60Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A71Higher | B69 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DIVB and QDF are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DIVBA
QDFC
In short
DIVB Most dividend funds only count the check that hits your account. DIVB's index also counts buybacks, treating a shrinking share count as cash returned to owners, and it charges five basis points to do it.
QDF A dividend screen that doesn't want to be a bond proxy: QDF ranks large and mid-cap US payers on dividend quality, then targets beta similar to its parent index. 0.39% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
DIVB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies selected for a history of dividend payments and/or share buybacks, providing equity exposure oriented toward income and long-term growth.
QDF The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy uses a quality-focused dividend approach intended to pursue income and total return through U.S. equity securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DIVB vs QDF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DIVB vs QDF Cost
Overpaying QDF vs DIVB
$6,838
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DIVB 0.05%
$1,060
QDF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DIVB | QDF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $705 | $613 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,725 | $2,365 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $7,898 | $6,838 |
- 0.05%DIVB, cheaper
- 0.39%QDF
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DIVB 2nd cheapest of 52 funds
QDF 32nd cheapest of 52 funds
DIVB vs QDF Dividends
- DIVB 2.08%, better
- QDF 1.51%
- DIVB $1.48
- QDF $1.37
- DIVB $0.42
- QDF $0.35
- DIVB Sep 15, 2026
- QDF Sep 18, 2026
- DIVB Sep 18, 2026
- QDF Sep 24, 2026
- DIVB Quarterly
- QDF Quarterly
Distribution history
DIVB vs QDF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DIVB
- QDF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DIVB 14.0%QDF 11.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DIVB 1.58, betterQDF 1.34
- Worst fall
- DIVB −21.1%, betterQDF −22.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DIVB 0.88QDF 0.92
DIVB and QDF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
