DGRO ranks 1st and QDF 37th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DGRO vs QDF
DGRO −0.31pt a year
0.08%0.39%
DGRO 56.5×the volume
1.39M24.5K
DGRO +2.0pt
+14.1%+12.1%
DGRO vs QDF Performance
+71.0%+71.6%
- DGRO 0.08%, better
- QDF 0.39%
- DGRO $45.3B
- QDF $2.17B
- DGRO +21.5%, better
- QDF +14.5%
- DGRO 1.84%, better
- QDF 1.51%
- DGRO 394
- QDF 143
- DGRO 1.39M sh, better
- QDF 24.5K sh
- DGRO $81.00
- QDF $90.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DGRO | QDF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | D36 |
| Mission | A98Higher | B62 |
| Risk | A77Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | B68 |
| Holdings | B62Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A87Higher | B69 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DGRO and QDF are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DGROA
QDFC
In short
DGRO BlackRock's dividend-growth screen casts a wider net than most: five straight years of raises rather than ten, plus a payout-ratio cap that filters out stretched payers. About 400 US dividend raisers, large through small cap, for 0.08% a year.
QDF A dividend screen that doesn't want to be a bond proxy: QDF ranks large and mid-cap US payers on dividend quality, then targets beta similar to its parent index. 0.39% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
DGRO The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. equities whose dividends have grown consistently.
QDF The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy uses a quality-focused dividend approach intended to pursue income and total return through U.S. equity securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DGRO vs QDF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DGRO vs QDF Cost
Overpaying QDF vs DGRO
$6,209
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DGRO 0.08%
$1,689
QDF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DGRO | QDF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $705 | $558 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,725 | $2,150 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $7,898 | $6,209 |
- 0.08%DGRO, cheaper
- 0.39%QDF
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DGRO 8th cheapest of 52 funds
QDF 32nd cheapest of 52 funds
DGRO vs QDF Dividends
- DGRO 1.84%, better
- QDF 1.51%
- DGRO $1.49
- QDF $1.37
- DGRO $0.39
- QDF $0.35
- DGRO Sep 15, 2026
- QDF Sep 18, 2026
- DGRO Sep 18, 2026
- QDF Sep 24, 2026
- DGRO Quarterly
- QDF Quarterly
Distribution history
DGRO vs QDF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DGRO
- QDF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DGRO 10.8%, betterQDF 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DGRO 1.47, betterQDF 1.34
- Worst fall
- DGRO −19.3%, betterQDF −22.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DGRO 0.67QDF 0.92
DGRO and QDF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





