Skip to content

DGRO vs QDF

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

DGROANYSE Arca

Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF

QDFCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

DGRO −0.31pt a year

DGRO0.08%QDF0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

DGRO 56.5×the volume

DGRO1.39MQDF24.5K

10Y return · a year

DGRO +2.0pt

DGRO+14.1%QDF+12.1%

DGRO vs QDF Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+71.0%DGRO+71.6%QDF

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. DGRO +71.0%. QDF +71.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DGRO 0.08%, better
QDF 0.39%
Fund size
DGRO $45.3B
QDF $2.17B
1Y total return
DGRO +21.5%, better
QDF +14.5%
Yield (12M)
DGRO 1.84%, better
QDF 1.51%
Holdings
DGRO 394
QDF 143
Avg volume (30D)
DGRO 1.39M sh, better
QDF 24.5K sh
NAV per share
DGRO $81.00
QDF $90.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DGRO: Cost 88, Risk 77, Mission 98, Tradability 90, Holdings 62, Durability 87. QDF: Cost 36, Risk 40, Mission 62, Tradability 68, Holdings 37, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for DGRO, QDF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDGROQDF
Cost30% weightA88HigherD36
Mission25% weightA98HigherB62
Risk15% weightA77HigherC40
Tradability15% weightA90HigherB68
Holdings10% weightB62HigherD37
Durability5% weightA87HigherB69

Rank among US Dividend Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DGRO and QDF are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Dividend Index⁠

Category · 52 funds
See all 52 ›

DGRO ranks 1st and QDF 37th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ADGROiShares Core Dividend Growth ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASCHDSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 37COUSAALPS Funds O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETFScore 49
  4. Rank 37CQDFNorthern Trust Quality Dividend ETFScore 49
  5. Rank 40COUSMALPS O'Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DGROAiShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

QDFCNorthern Trust Quality Dividend ETF

In short

DGRO BlackRock's dividend-growth screen casts a wider net than most: five straight years of raises rather than ten, plus a payout-ratio cap that filters out stretched payers. About 400 US dividend raisers, large through small cap, for 0.08% a year.

QDF A dividend screen that doesn't want to be a bond proxy: QDF ranks large and mid-cap US payers on dividend quality, then targets beta similar to its parent index. 0.39% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

DGRO The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. equities whose dividends have grown consistently.

QDF The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy uses a quality-focused dividend approach intended to pursue income and total return through U.S. equity securities.

Why people hold it

  • DGRO Costs 0.08% a year, a small fraction of the typical fee among US dividend-screen ETFs.
  • The screen has teeth: a qualified dividend, five years of uninterrupted dividend growth, a payout ratio under 75%, and the top decile of yielders cut before the other tests run.ishares.com
  • Roughly 400 names across large, mid and small caps, weighted by the dividend dollars each company pays rather than by market cap.ishares.comcib.barclays
  • Tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index about as tightly as this group gets, and it's an actively traded, multi-billion-dollar fund that has run since 2014.
  • QDF The index starts with 1,250 large and mid-cap US companies, cuts non-payers, then drops the lowest-scoring quintile on a Dividend Quality Score built from financial health measures.flexshares.com
  • Quality is ranked sector by sector, an apples-to-apples comparison that surfaces payers across the market instead of crowding into the usual high-yield corners.flexshares.com
  • The index targets overall beta similar to the Northern Trust 1250 parent, so the yield tilt is not built around a defensive, low-beta portfolio.flexshares.com
  • Live since December 2012, a multi-billion-dollar fund holding roughly 140 stocks and paying quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • DGRO Chopping the highest-yielding decile is deliberate: this is built around payout growth and dividend durability, not the fattest current yield on the shelf.ishares.com
  • Only dividend payers qualify, so some of the market's biggest non-paying growth companies sit outside the portfolio by rule.ishares.com
  • Income arrives quarterly, not monthly, and this is plain US stock exposure: no buffer, no hedge, full equity risk.
  • QDF At 0.39% (net of a waiver through March 1, 2027) the fee lands near the category median, but well above index rivals like SCHD at 0.06% and VIG at 0.04%.
  • Trades less actively than the category's largest funds, so limit orders are the sane way in and out.
  • FlexShares flags that the fund can sit more than 25% in one industry and uses representative sampling, which can widen the gap between fund and index returns.flexshares.com

Full DGRO profile⁠

Full QDF profile⁠

DGRO vs QDF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DGRO vs QDF Cost

Overpaying QDF vs DGRO

$6,209

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DGRO 0.08%

    $1,689

  • QDF 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DGRO 0.08%
  • QDF 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530QDF $7,898DGRO $1,689

Year by year

YearDGROQDFOverpaying
10$147$705$558
20$575$2,725$2,150
30$1,689$7,898$6,209

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%DGRO, cheaper
  • 0.39%QDF
  • Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
  • Median 0.35%

DGRO 8th cheapest of 52 funds

QDF 32nd cheapest of 52 funds

DGRO vs QDF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DGRO 1.84%, better
QDF 1.51%
Payout (12M)
DGRO $1.49
QDF $1.37
Last payment
DGRO $0.39
QDF $0.35
Ex-dividend
DGRO Sep 15, 2026
QDF Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
DGRO Sep 18, 2026
QDF Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
DGRO Quarterly
QDF Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

DGROQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll DGRO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.16; Jun 27, 2017 $0.19; Sep 26, 2017 $0.16; Dec 19, 2017 $0.19; Mar 22, 2018 $0.19; Jun 26, 2018 $0.19; Sep 26, 2018 $0.23; Dec 17, 2018 $0.20; Mar 20, 2019 $0.22; Jun 17, 2019 $0.23; Sep 24, 2019 $0.25; Dec 16, 2019 $0.23; Mar 25, 2020 $0.25; Jun 15, 2020 $0.25; Sep 23, 2020 $0.26; Dec 14, 2020 $0.27; Mar 25, 2021 $0.26; Jun 10, 2021 $0.26; Sep 24, 2021 $0.25; Dec 13, 2021 $0.30; Mar 24, 2022 $0.26; Jun 9, 2022 $0.23; Sep 26, 2022 $0.34; Dec 13, 2022 $0.33; Mar 23, 2023 $0.30; Jun 7, 2023 $0.26; Sep 26, 2023 $0.39; Dec 20, 2023 $0.37; Mar 21, 2024 $0.31; Jun 11, 2024 $0.29; Sep 25, 2024 $0.40; Dec 17, 2024 $0.38; Mar 18, 2025 $0.31; Jun 16, 2025 $0.32; Sep 16, 2025 $0.37; Dec 16, 2025 $0.45; Mar 17, 2026 $0.33; Jun 15, 2026 $0.33; Sep 15, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
QDFQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll QDF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.24; Jun 19, 2017 $0.28; Sep 18, 2017 $0.30; Dec 21, 2017 $0.40; Mar 19, 2018 $0.18; Jun 18, 2018 $0.31; Sep 24, 2018 $0.33; Dec 21, 2018 $0.89; Mar 15, 2019 $0.20; Jun 21, 2019 $0.39; Sep 20, 2019 $0.25; Dec 20, 2019 $0.63; Mar 20, 2020 $0.26; Jun 19, 2020 $0.33; Sep 18, 2020 $0.27; Dec 18, 2020 $0.31; Mar 19, 2021 $0.23; Jun 18, 2021 $0.27; Sep 17, 2021 $0.29; Dec 17, 2021 $0.37; Mar 18, 2022 $0.25; Jun 17, 2022 $0.33; Sep 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.39; Mar 17, 2023 $0.21; Jun 16, 2023 $0.39; Sep 15, 2023 $0.29; Dec 15, 2023 $0.45; Mar 15, 2024 $0.19; Jun 21, 2024 $0.34; Sep 20, 2024 $0.34; Dec 20, 2024 $0.48; Mar 21, 2025 $0.19; Jun 20, 2025 $0.35; Sep 19, 2025 $0.32; Dec 19, 2025 $0.47; Mar 20, 2026 $0.20; Jun 18, 2026 $0.36; Sep 18, 2026 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

DGRO vs QDF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DGRO
  • QDF
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QDF −22.1% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DGRO 10.8%, betterQDF 11.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DGRO 1.47, betterQDF 1.34
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DGRO −19.3%, betterQDF −22.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DGRO 0.67QDF 0.92

DGRO and QDF in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DGROAvsSCHDA

    iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDFCvsSCHDA

    Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF · Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DGROAvsDIVBA

    iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF · iShares Core Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDFCvsDIVBA

    Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF · iShares Core Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DGROAvsSPYDA

    iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDFCvsSPYDA

    Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.