SPYD ranks 4th and QDF 37th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
QDF vs SPYD
SPYD −0.32pt a year
0.39%0.07%
SPYD 40.9×the volume
24.5K1M
QDF +3.2pt
+12.1%+8.9%
QDF vs SPYD Performance
+71.6%+52.1%
- QDF 0.39%
- SPYD 0.07%, better
- QDF $2.17B
- SPYD $7.61B
- QDF +14.5%
- SPYD +20.6%, better
- QDF 1.51%
- SPYD 4.20%, better
- QDF 143
- SPYD 81
- QDF 24.5K sh
- SPYD 1M sh, better
- QDF $90.50
- SPYD $48.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QDF | SPYD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A88Higher |
| Mission | B62 | A88Higher |
| Risk | C40 | C40 |
| Tradability | B68 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | A73Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. QDF and SPYD are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QDFC
SPYDA
In short
QDF A dividend screen that doesn't want to be a bond proxy: QDF ranks large and mid-cap US payers on dividend quality, then targets beta similar to its parent index. 0.39% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
SPYD Most dividend ETFs hunt for companies that keep raising payouts. SPYD skips the courtship and goes straight for the yield: roughly 80 high-dividend names out of the S&P 500, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
QDF The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy uses a quality-focused dividend approach intended to pursue income and total return through U.S. equity securities.
SPYD The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return of the S&P 500 High Dividend Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QDF vs SPYD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QDF vs SPYD Cost
Overpaying QDF vs SPYD
$6,418
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QDF 0.39%
$7,898
SPYD 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QDF | SPYD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $128 | $577 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $503 | $2,222 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $1,480 | $6,418 |
- 0.39%QDF
- 0.07%SPYD, cheaper
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
SPYD 6th cheapest of 52 funds
QDF 32nd cheapest of 52 funds
QDF vs SPYD Dividends
- QDF 1.51%
- SPYD 4.20%, better
- QDF $1.37
- SPYD $2.06
- QDF $0.35
- SPYD $0.52
- QDF Sep 18, 2026
- SPYD Sep 21, 2026
- QDF Sep 24, 2026
- SPYD Sep 23, 2026
- QDF Quarterly
- SPYD Quarterly
Distribution history
QDF vs SPYD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QDF
- SPYD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QDF 11.3%, betterSPYD 14.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- QDF 1.34, betterSPYD 0.96
- Worst fall
- QDF −22.1%, betterSPYD −22.2%
- Market sensitivity
- QDF 0.92SPYD 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

