DIVB ranks 3rd and TMDV 46th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DIVB vs TMDV
DIVB −0.30pt a year
0.05%0.35%
DIVB 1562.6×the volume
298K191
DIVB +9.9pt
+14.5%+4.6%
DIVB vs TMDV Performance
+96.4%+25.3%
- DIVB 0.05%, better
- TMDV 0.35%
- DIVB $2.31B
- TMDV $5M
- DIVB +40.7%, better
- TMDV +18.6%
- DIVB 2.08%
- TMDV 2.46%, better
- DIVB 384
- TMDV 66
- DIVB 298K sh, better
- TMDV 191 sh
- DIVB $71.28
- TMDV $53.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DIVB | TMDV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | B57 |
| Mission | A86Higher | A84 |
| Risk | A74Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | F4 |
| Holdings | B60 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | D34 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DIVB and TMDV are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DIVBA
TMDVC
In short
DIVB Most dividend funds only count the check that hits your account. DIVB's index also counts buybacks, treating a shrinking share count as cash returned to owners, and it charges five basis points to do it.
TMDV A dividend fund built around a longevity test: TMDV holds roughly 60 U.S. companies with long unbroken records of raising their payouts, drawn from the full Russell 3000 rather than only the mega-cap crowd.
Stated mandate
DIVB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies selected for a history of dividend payments and/or share buybacks, providing equity exposure oriented toward income and long-term growth.
TMDV TMDV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, which selects U.S. companies with long records of annual dividend increases.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DIVB vs TMDV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DIVB vs TMDV Cost
Overpaying TMDV vs DIVB
$6,066
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DIVB 0.05%
$1,060
TMDV 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DIVB | TMDV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $634 | $542 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,454 | $2,094 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $7,126 | $6,066 |
- 0.05%DIVB, cheaper
- 0.35%TMDV
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DIVB 2nd cheapest of 52 funds
TMDV 20th cheapest of 52 funds
DIVB vs TMDV Dividends
- DIVB 2.08%
- TMDV 2.46%, better
- DIVB $1.48
- TMDV $1.31
- DIVB $0.42
- TMDV $0.30
- DIVB Sep 15, 2026
- TMDV Sep 23, 2026
- DIVB Sep 18, 2026
- TMDV Sep 29, 2026
- DIVB Quarterly
- TMDV Quarterly
Distribution history
DIVB vs TMDV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DIVB
- TMDV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DIVB 14.0%TMDV 13.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DIVB 1.58, betterTMDV 0.51
- Worst fall
- DIVB −21.1%TMDV −17.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DIVB 0.88TMDV 0.57
DIVB and TMDV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
