SCHD ranks 2nd and TMDV 46th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
SCHD vs TMDV
SCHD −0.29pt a year
0.06%0.35%
SCHD 118303.2×the volume
22.6M191
SCHD +6.0pt
+10.6%+4.6%
SCHD vs TMDV Performance
+65.6%+25.3%
- SCHD 0.06%, better
- TMDV 0.35%
- SCHD $121B
- TMDV $5M
- SCHD +38.4%, better
- TMDV +18.6%
- SCHD 2.95%, better
- TMDV 2.46%
- SCHD 100
- TMDV 66
- SCHD 22.6M sh, better
- TMDV 191 sh
- SCHD $35.77
- TMDV $53.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHD | TMDV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | B57 |
| Mission | A84 | A84 |
| Risk | A71Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | F4 |
| Holdings | D32 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | D34 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. SCHD and TMDV are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHDA
TMDVC
In short
SCHD The dividend fund that checks the balance sheet before it checks the yield. SCHD only considers companies with 10 straight years of payouts, then ranks the survivors on cash flow, return on equity and dividend growth. Quality gate first, income second, at six basis points.
TMDV A dividend fund built around a longevity test: TMDV holds roughly 60 U.S. companies with long unbroken records of raising their payouts, drawn from the full Russell 3000 rather than only the mega-cap crowd.
Stated mandate
SCHD The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100TM Index.
TMDV TMDV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, which selects U.S. companies with long records of annual dividend increases.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHD vs TMDV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHD vs TMDV Cost
Overpaying TMDV vs SCHD
$5,856
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHD 0.06%
$1,270
TMDV 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHD | TMDV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $634 | $524 |
| 20 | $432 | $2,454 | $2,022 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $7,126 | $5,856 |
- 0.06%SCHD, cheaper
- 0.35%TMDV
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
SCHD 4th cheapest of 52 funds
TMDV 20th cheapest of 52 funds
SCHD vs TMDV Dividends
- SCHD 2.95%, better
- TMDV 2.46%
- SCHD $1.05
- TMDV $1.31
- SCHD $0.27
- TMDV $0.30
- SCHD Sep 23, 2026
- TMDV Sep 23, 2026
- SCHD Sep 28, 2026
- TMDV Sep 29, 2026
- SCHD Quarterly
- TMDV Quarterly
Distribution history
SCHD vs TMDV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHD
- TMDV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHD 14.3%TMDV 13.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHD 1.08, betterTMDV 0.51
- Worst fall
- SCHD −16.8%, betterTMDV −17.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHD 0.58TMDV 0.57
SCHD and TMDV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





