DGRO ranks 1st and TMDV 46th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DGRO vs TMDV
DGRO −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
DGRO 7255.8×the volume
1.39M191
DGRO +6.7pt
+11.3%+4.6%
DGRO vs TMDV Performance
+71.0%+25.3%
- DGRO 0.08%, better
- TMDV 0.35%
- DGRO $45.3B
- TMDV $5M
- DGRO +21.5%, better
- TMDV +18.6%
- DGRO 1.84%
- TMDV 2.46%, better
- DGRO 394
- TMDV 66
- DGRO 1.39M sh, better
- TMDV 191 sh
- DGRO $81.00
- TMDV $53.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DGRO | TMDV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | B57 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A84 |
| Risk | A77Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | F4 |
| Holdings | B62 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A87Higher | D34 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DGRO and TMDV are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DGROA
TMDVC
In short
DGRO BlackRock's dividend-growth screen casts a wider net than most: five straight years of raises rather than ten, plus a payout-ratio cap that filters out stretched payers. About 400 US dividend raisers, large through small cap, for 0.08% a year.
TMDV A dividend fund built around a longevity test: TMDV holds roughly 60 U.S. companies with long unbroken records of raising their payouts, drawn from the full Russell 3000 rather than only the mega-cap crowd.
Stated mandate
DGRO The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. equities whose dividends have grown consistently.
TMDV TMDV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, which selects U.S. companies with long records of annual dividend increases.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DGRO vs TMDV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DGRO vs TMDV Cost
Overpaying TMDV vs DGRO
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DGRO 0.08%
$1,689
TMDV 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DGRO | TMDV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $634 | $487 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,454 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $7,126 | $5,437 |
- 0.08%DGRO, cheaper
- 0.35%TMDV
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DGRO 8th cheapest of 52 funds
TMDV 20th cheapest of 52 funds
DGRO vs TMDV Dividends
- DGRO 1.84%
- TMDV 2.46%, better
- DGRO $1.49
- TMDV $1.31
- DGRO $0.39
- TMDV $0.30
- DGRO Sep 15, 2026
- TMDV Sep 23, 2026
- DGRO Sep 18, 2026
- TMDV Sep 29, 2026
- DGRO Quarterly
- TMDV Quarterly
Distribution history
DGRO vs TMDV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DGRO
- TMDV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DGRO 10.8%, betterTMDV 13.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- DGRO 1.47, betterTMDV 0.51
- Worst fall
- DGRO −19.3%TMDV −17.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DGRO 0.67TMDV 0.57
DGRO and TMDV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





