Skip to content

DMAR vs PSCX

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March

DMARCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

PSCXBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSCX −0.36pt a year

DMAR0.85%PSCX0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

DMAR 13.5×the volume

DMAR13.5KPSCX998

5Y return · a year

PSCX +0.8pt

DMAR+7.7%PSCX+8.5%

DMAR vs PSCX Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+44.7%DMAR+50.6%PSCX

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. DMAR +44.7%. PSCX +50.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%20%30%Oct 2021Mar 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DMAR 0.85%
PSCX 0.49%, better
Fund size
DMAR $472M
PSCX $47M
1Y total return
DMAR +11.7%, better
PSCX +10.2%
Holdings
DMAR 3
PSCX 3
Avg volume (30D)
DMAR 13.5K sh, better
PSCX 998 sh
NAV per share
DMAR $45.81
PSCX $33.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DMAR: Cost 31, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 61, Durability 58. PSCX: Cost 81, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings not scored, Durability 28.
Pillar letters and Scores for DMAR, PSCX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDMARPSCX
Cost30% weightD31A81Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA72HigherB56
Tradability15% weightC46C47Higher
Holdings10% weightB61Not scored
Durability5% weightB58HigherD28

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DMAR and PSCX are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

PSCX ranks 1st and DMAR 10th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 10CDAUGFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - AugustScore 47
  4. Rank 10CDMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  5. Rank 12CDJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DMARCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March

PSCXBPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

In short

DMAR Deep buffer, March vintage: DMAR wears the first 5% of a drop in the S&P 500 ETF it references, then absorbs the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets each March. The terms are written into the prospectus, not left to a manager's hunch.

PSCX A 25% deep buffer against the S&P 500, reset every January, for 0.49% a year, well under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group. The trade-off: a cap on the upside, set fresh each outcome period.

Stated mandate

DMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a 13.07% cap while buffering the underlying ETF's losses in the 5%-to-30% band during the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

PSCX The fund seeks to match the pre-fee returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.

Why people hold it

  • DMAR Deep, not decorative: the options package targets losses in the 5% to 30% band on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust across each annual outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • One of twelve monthly vintages in First Trust's deep buffer lineup, running since 2021, so entry points and reset dates can be staggered across the calendar.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself: plain large-cap US equity, no factor tilt, no stock-picking discretion layered on top.
  • Ranks among the stronger implementations in its 18-fund deep buffer cohort, with risk behavior and trading quality doing most of the lifting.
  • PSCX At 0.49%, one of the cheaper ways to buy a deep buffer: cohort peers DMAR (0.85%) and UFEB (0.79%) charge more for a similar job.
  • The cushion is deep. The structure aims to absorb the first 25% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over an approximately one-year outcome period.paceretfs.com
  • Pacer runs the same recipe on a quarterly calendar (PSCW in April, PSCQ in October), so the January reset is a choice of start date, not the only option.
  • Live since 2020, so the strategy has cycled through several full outcome periods, not one flattering stretch.

Worth knowing

  • DMAR 0.85% is the going rate for deep buffers, but Pacer's SOS Conservative funds (PSCX, PSCW) run a similar playbook for 0.49%.
  • It follows price return only, so index dividends are not passed through and income is not part of the design.
  • The first 5% of a decline is unbuffered, the upside is capped, and both the cap and the remaining buffer shift for anyone buying mid-period.
  • PSCX Upside is capped. A new cap is set at the start of each outcome period, and a deeper buffer generally comes with a lower ceiling.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are measured over the full outcome period and stated before fees. Buy mid-period and your own cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.paceretfs.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on mainstream index ETFs.

Full DMAR profile⁠

Full PSCX profile⁠

DMAR vs PSCX Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DMAR vs PSCX Cost

Overpaying DMAR vs PSCX

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSCX 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DMAR 0.85%
  • PSCX 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DMAR $16,199PSCX $9,792

Year by year

YearDMARPSCXOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DMAR
  • 0.49%PSCX, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

PSCX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

DMAR 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DMAR vs PSCX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
DMAR None
PSCX None

Distribution history

DMARAll DMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSCXAll PSCX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DMAR vs PSCX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DMAR
  • PSCX
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PSCX −10.2% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%−2%0%Oct 2021Mar 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DMAR 5.0%, betterPSCX 6.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DMAR 1.54, betterPSCX 1.45
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DMAR −9.8%, betterPSCX −10.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DMAR 0.37PSCX 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • DMARCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCXBvsUFEBB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMARCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCXBvsPSCQB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMARCvsDFEBC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCXBvsDFEBC

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.