Skip to content

DMAR vs PSCQ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March

DMARCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

PSCQBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSCQ −0.36pt a year

DMAR0.85%PSCQ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

DMAR 5.5×the volume

DMAR13.5KPSCQ2.47K

5Y return · a year

PSCQ +1.3pt

DMAR+7.7%PSCQ+9.0%

DMAR vs PSCQ Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+44.7%DMAR+53.5%PSCQ

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. DMAR +44.7%. PSCQ +53.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%20%30%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DMAR 0.85%
PSCQ 0.49%, better
Fund size
DMAR $472M
PSCQ $49M
1Y total return
DMAR +11.7%, better
PSCQ +9.8%
Holdings
DMAR 3
PSCQ 3
Avg volume (30D)
DMAR 13.5K sh, better
PSCQ 2.47K sh
NAV per share
DMAR $45.81
PSCQ $32.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DMAR: Cost 31, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 61, Durability 58. PSCQ: Cost 81, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 17.
Pillar letters and Scores for DMAR, PSCQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDMARPSCQ
Cost30% weightD31A81Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA72HigherC49
Tradability15% weightC46C48Higher
Holdings10% weightB61Not scored
Durability5% weightB58HigherF17

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DMAR and PSCQ are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

PSCQ ranks 3rd and DMAR 10th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPSCQPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4CDFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  5. Rank 10CDAUGFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - AugustScore 47
  6. Rank 10CDMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  7. Rank 12CDJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DMARCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March

PSCQBPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

In short

DMAR Deep buffer, March vintage: DMAR wears the first 5% of a drop in the S&P 500 ETF it references, then absorbs the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets each March. The terms are written into the prospectus, not left to a manager's hunch.

PSCQ A deep buffer with a deductible: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then the next 25 points get cushioned, up to a cap reset each October. At 0.49% a year, it is a low-cost way to run that trade.

Stated mandate

DMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a 13.07% cap while buffering the underlying ETF's losses in the 5%-to-30% band during the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

PSCQ The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.

Why people hold it

  • DMAR Deep, not decorative: the options package targets losses in the 5% to 30% band on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust across each annual outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • One of twelve monthly vintages in First Trust's deep buffer lineup, running since 2021, so entry points and reset dates can be staggered across the calendar.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself: plain large-cap US equity, no factor tilt, no stock-picking discretion layered on top.
  • Ranks among the stronger implementations in its 18-fund deep buffer cohort, with risk behavior and trading quality doing most of the lifting.
  • PSCQ 0.49% a year, at the cheap end of the SPY deep-buffer group. In a capped strategy, fees come straight out of the upside you are allowed to keep.
  • Real depth of cushion: underlying losses from 5% down to 30% are absorbed by the options package, 25 percentage points of protection across a full one-year outcome period.paceretfs.com
  • October start date. Pacer runs the same conservative recipe in January, April and July windows, so you choose which twelve months (and which cap) you live with.
  • Plain plumbing: FLEX options on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, no stock picking, no leverage. It sits in the upper half of its deep-buffer peer group.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • DMAR 0.85% is the going rate for deep buffers, but Pacer's SOS Conservative funds (PSCX, PSCW) run a similar playbook for 0.49%.
  • It follows price return only, so index dividends are not passed through and income is not part of the design.
  • The first 5% of a decline is unbuffered, the upside is capped, and both the cap and the remaining buffer shift for anyone buying mid-period.
  • PSCQ The cap is the price of the cushion. Upside stops at a level set when the October period begins, so a roaring S&P year leaves money on the table.
  • The 5% to 30% math is built for holders of the full period. Buy mid-period and your effective buffer and cap depend on the price you pay.paceretfs.com
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can run wider than on big index ETFs. It holds options, not dividend payers, so income is not part of the design.

Full DMAR profile⁠

Full PSCQ profile⁠

DMAR vs PSCQ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DMAR vs PSCQ Cost

Overpaying DMAR vs PSCQ

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSCQ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DMAR 0.85%
  • PSCQ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DMAR $16,199PSCQ $9,792

Year by year

YearDMARPSCQOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DMAR
  • 0.49%PSCQ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

PSCQ 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

DMAR 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DMAR vs PSCQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
DMAR None
PSCQ None

Distribution history

DMARAll DMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSCQAll PSCQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DMAR vs PSCQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DMAR
  • PSCQ
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PSCQ −9.9% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−5%−2.5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DMAR 5.0%, betterPSCQ 6.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DMAR 1.54, betterPSCQ 1.30
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DMAR −9.8%, betterPSCQ −9.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DMAR 0.37PSCQ 0.40

Popular comparisons

  • DMARCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCQBvsPSCXB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMARCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCQBvsUFEBB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMARCvsDFEBC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCQBvsDFEBC

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF · FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.