PSCQ ranks 3rd and DMAR 10th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
DMAR vs PSCQ
PSCQ −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
DMAR 5.5×the volume
13.5K2.47K
PSCQ +1.3pt
+7.7%+9.0%
DMAR vs PSCQ Performance
+44.7%+53.5%
- DMAR 0.85%
- PSCQ 0.49%, better
- DMAR $472M
- PSCQ $49M
- DMAR +11.7%, better
- PSCQ +9.8%
- DMAR 3
- PSCQ 3
- DMAR 13.5K sh, better
- PSCQ 2.47K sh
- DMAR $45.81
- PSCQ $32.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DMAR | PSCQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | C46 | C48Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | |
| Durability | B58Higher | F17 |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. DMAR and PSCQ are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DMARC
PSCQB
In short
DMAR Deep buffer, March vintage: DMAR wears the first 5% of a drop in the S&P 500 ETF it references, then absorbs the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets each March. The terms are written into the prospectus, not left to a manager's hunch.
PSCQ A deep buffer with a deductible: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then the next 25 points get cushioned, up to a cap reset each October. At 0.49% a year, it is a low-cost way to run that trade.
Stated mandate
DMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a 13.07% cap while buffering the underlying ETF's losses in the 5%-to-30% band during the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.
PSCQ The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DMAR vs PSCQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DMAR vs PSCQ Cost
Overpaying DMAR vs PSCQ
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DMAR 0.85%
$16,199
PSCQ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DMAR | PSCQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%DMAR
- 0.49%PSCQ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
PSCQ 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
DMAR 8th cheapest of 19 funds
DMAR vs PSCQ Dividends
- DMAR None
- PSCQ None
Distribution history
DMAR vs PSCQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DMAR
- PSCQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DMAR 5.0%, betterPSCQ 6.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DMAR 1.54, betterPSCQ 1.30
- Worst fall
- DMAR −9.8%, betterPSCQ −9.9%
- Market sensitivity
- DMAR 0.37PSCQ 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.