Skip to content

DFEB vs DMAR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

DFEBCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March

DMARCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

DFEB0.85%DMAR0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

DFEB 1.01×the volume

DFEB13.6KDMAR13.5K

5Y return · a year

DFEB +0.4pt

DFEB+8.1%DMAR+7.7%

DFEB vs DMAR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+47.8%DFEB+44.7%DMAR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. DFEB +47.8%. DMAR +44.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%20%30%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DFEB 0.85%
DMAR 0.85%
Fund size
DFEB $456M
DMAR $472M
1Y total return
DFEB +10.2%
DMAR +11.7%, better
Holdings
DFEB 3
DMAR 3
Avg volume (30D)
DFEB 13.6K sh, better
DMAR 13.5K sh
NAV per share
DFEB $51.65
DMAR $45.81
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFEB: Cost 31, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 63, Durability 74. DMAR: Cost 31, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 61, Durability 58.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFEB, DMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFEBDMAR
Cost30% weightD31D31
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66A72Higher
Tradability15% weightA77HigherC46
Holdings10% weightB63HigherB61
Durability5% weightA74HigherB58

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFEB and DMAR are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

DFEB ranks 4th and DMAR 10th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPSCQPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4CDFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  5. Rank 4CPSCWPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 10CDAUGFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - AugustScore 47
  7. Rank 10CDMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  8. Rank 12CDJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFEBCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

DMARCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March

In short

DFEB A buffer with a deductible. DFEB lets the first 5% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust land on you, then covers the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets every February.

DMAR Deep buffer, March vintage: DMAR wears the first 5% of a drop in the S&P 500 ETF it references, then absorbs the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets each March. The terms are written into the prospectus, not left to a manager's hunch.

Stated mandate

DFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.87% upside cap, while protecting against Underlying ETF losses from -5% through -30% during the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.

DMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a 13.07% cap while buffering the underlying ETF's losses in the 5%-to-30% band during the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • DFEB Deep coverage where it hurts: the fund targets protection against reference-ETF losses from -5% through -30%, a 25-point band, over each one-year outcome period.
  • One of twelve monthly vintages on the same reference ETF (DMAR, DJUN, DDEC and the rest), so entries can be laddered across the calendar instead of hinging on one start date.
  • Running since 2020, it has rolled through several full outcome periods, and it sits in the upper half of its deep-buffer peer group.
  • At 0.85%, the fee sits right at the median for deep-buffer funds tracking this kind of strategy.
  • DMAR Deep, not decorative: the options package targets losses in the 5% to 30% band on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust across each annual outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • One of twelve monthly vintages in First Trust's deep buffer lineup, running since 2021, so entry points and reset dates can be staggered across the calendar.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself: plain large-cap US equity, no factor tilt, no stock-picking discretion layered on top.
  • Ranks among the stronger implementations in its 18-fund deep buffer cohort, with risk behavior and trading quality doing most of the lifting.

Worth knowing

  • DFEB The trade for depth: you absorb the first 5% of losses yourself, and gains stop at a cap that is reset each February from option pricing at the time.
  • It tracks price return only, so the reference ETF's dividends are not passed along, and the fund has not been paying distributions.
  • Cheaper deep-buffer options exist (PSCX and PSCW run 0.49%), and DFEB trades lightly, so limit orders are the sane way in and out.
  • DMAR 0.85% is the going rate for deep buffers, but Pacer's SOS Conservative funds (PSCX, PSCW) run a similar playbook for 0.49%.
  • It follows price return only, so index dividends are not passed through and income is not part of the design.
  • The first 5% of a decline is unbuffered, the upside is capped, and both the cap and the remaining buffer shift for anyone buying mid-period.

Full DFEB profile⁠

Full DMAR profile⁠

DFEB vs DMAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFEB vs DMAR Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFEB 0.85%

    $16,199

  • DMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFEB 0.85%
  • DMAR 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DFEB $16,199DMAR $16,199

Year by year

YearDFEBDMAR
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DFEB
  • 0.85%DMAR
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

DFEB 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DMAR 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DFEB vs DMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
DFEB None
DMAR None

Distribution history

DFEBAll DFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DMARAll DMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DFEB vs DMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DFEB
  • DMAR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: DMAR −9.8% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−5%−2.5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFEB 6.1%DMAR 5.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFEB 1.57, betterDMAR 1.54
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFEB −10.0%DMAR −9.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFEB 0.50DMAR 0.37

Popular comparisons

  • DFEBCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMARCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMARCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DMARCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.