DFEB ranks 4th and DMAR 10th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
DFEB vs DMAR
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.85%0.85%
DFEB 1.01×the volume
13.6K13.5K
DFEB +0.4pt
+8.1%+7.7%
DFEB vs DMAR Performance
+47.8%+44.7%
- DFEB 0.85%
- DMAR 0.85%
- DFEB $456M
- DMAR $472M
- DFEB +10.2%
- DMAR +11.7%, better
- DFEB 3
- DMAR 3
- DFEB 13.6K sh, better
- DMAR 13.5K sh
- DFEB $51.65
- DMAR $45.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFEB | DMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | D31 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | A77Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | B63Higher | B61 |
| Durability | A74Higher | B58 |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. DFEB and DMAR are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFEBC
DMARC
In short
DFEB A buffer with a deductible. DFEB lets the first 5% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust land on you, then covers the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets every February.
DMAR Deep buffer, March vintage: DMAR wears the first 5% of a drop in the S&P 500 ETF it references, then absorbs the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets each March. The terms are written into the prospectus, not left to a manager's hunch.
Stated mandate
DFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.87% upside cap, while protecting against Underlying ETF losses from -5% through -30% during the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.
DMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a 13.07% cap while buffering the underlying ETF's losses in the 5%-to-30% band during the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFEB vs DMAR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFEB vs DMAR Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFEB 0.85%
$16,199
DMAR 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFEB | DMAR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,706 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $16,199 |
- 0.85%DFEB
- 0.85%DMAR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
DFEB 8th cheapest of 19 funds
DMAR 8th cheapest of 19 funds
DFEB vs DMAR Dividends
- DFEB None
- DMAR None
Distribution history
DFEB vs DMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFEB
- DMAR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFEB 6.1%DMAR 5.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFEB 1.57, betterDMAR 1.54
- Worst fall
- DFEB −10.0%DMAR −9.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DFEB 0.50DMAR 0.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.