DOG ranks 1st and EFU 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs EFU
5.9%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 625.6×the volume
4.77M7.62K
DOG +8.2pt
−10.9%−19.1%
DOG vs EFU Performance
−20.7%−55.2%
- DOG 0.95%
- EFU 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- EFU $1M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- EFU −21.1%
- DOG 3.15%
- EFU 4.12%, better
- DOG 3
- EFU 1
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- EFU 7.62K sh
- DOG $22.02
- EFU $7.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | EFU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | F22 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | D36 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and EFU are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
EFUC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
EFU Nearly every inverse ETF shorts America. EFU goes the other way: -2x the daily move of the MSCI EAFE index, the developed markets of Europe, Australasia and the Far East. A 2007-vintage tool with a one-day job.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
EFU EFU seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to -2x the daily performance of the MSCI EAFE Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs EFU Holdings
How DOG and EFU differ
5.9%
Shared holdings make up 100% of EFU and 5.9% of DOG.
Level by level
- Holdings5.9%
Sector
No Sector split for EFU.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for EFU.
Concentration
- DOG100.0%
- EFU100.0%
- DOG2
- EFU0
Asset class
- DOG
- Equity
- EFU
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DOG2
- In both0
- Only in EFU0
Only in DOG
2 securities, 94.1% of DOG by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf89.61%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.45%
Only in EFU
0 securities, 0.0% of EFU by weight
Weight gaps
DOG and EFU share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs EFU Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
EFU 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | EFU |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%EFU
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EFU 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs EFU Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- EFU 4.12%, better
- DOG $0.69
- EFU $0.30
- DOG $0.17
- EFU $0.08
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- EFU Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- EFU Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- EFU Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs EFU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- EFU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterEFU 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21, betterEFU −1.45
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterEFU −77.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83EFU −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.