QQQD ranks 21st and EFU 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EFU vs QQQD
0.0%by weight
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
QQQD 8.9×the volume
7.62K68.1K
EFU vs QQQD Performance
−21.1%−0.7%
- EFU 0.95%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- EFU $1M
- QQQD $28M
- EFU −21.1%
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- EFU 4.12%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- EFU 1
- QQQD 3
- EFU 7.62K sh
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- EFU $7.38
- QQQD $12.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFU | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | F22 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D36 | D38Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EFU and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFUC
QQQDC
In short
EFU Nearly every inverse ETF shorts America. EFU goes the other way: -2x the daily move of the MSCI EAFE index, the developed markets of Europe, Australasia and the Far East. A 2007-vintage tool with a one-day job.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
EFU EFU seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to -2x the daily performance of the MSCI EAFE Index.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFU vs QQQD Holdings
How EFU and QQQD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EFU and 0.0% of QQQD.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for EFU and QQQD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for EFU.
Concentration
- EFU100.0%
- QQQD5083.3%
- EFU0
- QQQD0
Asset class
- EFU
- Equity
- QQQD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in EFU0
- In both0
- Only in QQQD0
Only in EFU
0 securities, 0.0% of EFU by weight
Only in QQQD
0 securities, 0.0% of QQQD by weight
Weight gaps
EFU and QQQD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFU vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying EFU vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFU 0.95%
$17,869
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFU | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%EFU
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
EFU 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EFU vs QQQD Dividends
- EFU 4.12%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- EFU $0.30
- QQQD $0.41
- EFU $0.08
- QQQD $0.10
- EFU Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- EFU Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- EFU Quarterly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
EFU vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFU 23.3%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFU −1.45QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- EFU −77.4%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- EFU −1.23QQQD −1.35
EFU and QQQD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
