RWM ranks 4th and YCS 5th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
RWM vs YCS
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 1291.1×the volume
30M23.3K
YCS +23.9pt
−11.1%+12.8%
RWM vs YCS Performance
−18.3%+166.0%
- RWM 0.95%
- YCS 0.95%
- RWM $163M
- YCS $27M
- RWM −10.2%
- YCS +11.7%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- YCS
- RWM 3
- YCS 1
- RWM 30M sh, better
- YCS 23.3K sh
- RWM $14.37
- YCS $54.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RWM | YCS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | A88Higher |
| Tradability | A90Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | B59 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. RWM and YCS are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RWMB
YCSB
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
YCS A 2008-vintage ProShares fund built for one job: expressing a bearish yen view at twice the daily move, in a brokerage account, without an FX platform or margin desk. Currency trading, ticker-sized.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
YCS YCS seeks daily results corresponding to -2 times the daily performance of the Japanese yen relative to the U.S. dollar, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RWM vs YCS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RWM vs YCS Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
YCS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RWM | YCS |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%RWM
- 0.95%YCS
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
YCS 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM vs YCS Dividends
- RWM 3.32%
- YCS
- RWM $0.48
- YCS None
- RWM $0.09
- YCS
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- YCS
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- YCS
- RWM Quarterly
- YCS
Distribution history
RWM vs YCS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RWM
- YCS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RWM 18.4%, betterYCS 20.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- RWM −0.99YCS 0.42, better
- Worst fall
- RWM −43.7%YCS −27.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RWM −1.23YCS −0.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.